Labour Court Database __________________________________________________________________________________ File Number: CD86994 Case Number: LCR10996 Section / Act: S67 Parties: AMALGAMATED BOTTLING LTD - and - ITGWU;ATGWU |
Claim for disturbance payment compensation. Labour Court Recommendation No. 10,996 A/L. Dear Mr. Cramp, I refer to Labour Court hearing between the above mentioned parties on 4th February, 1987. The Court recommends as follows:- " The Court having considered the submissions from the parties is of the view that it would not be justified in recommending payment for disturbance in this case and accordingly does not recommend concession of the claim." ~ Signed on behalf of the Labour Court. Evelyn O
Recommendation:
" The Court having considered the submissions from the parties is
" The Court having considered the submissions from the parties is
of the view that it would not be justified in recommending
of the view that it would not be justified in recommending
payment for disturbance in this case and accordingly does not
payment for disturbance in this case and accordingly does not
recommend concession of the claim."
recommend concession of the claim."
~
Signed on behalf of the Labour Court.
Evelyn Owens
___________________
Deputy Chairman.
Division: Ms Owens Mr McHenry Mr Devine
Text of Document__________________________________________________________________
Mr. M. O'Reilly, February, 1987.
A.T.G.W.U.,
30, Clanbrassil Street,
Dundalk,
Co. Louth.
PARTIES: AMALGAMATED BOTTLING COMPANY LIMITED
(REPRESENTED BY THE FEDERATED UNION OF EMPLOYERS)
AND
IRISH TRANSPORT AND GENERAL WORKERS' UNION
AMALGAMATED TRANSPORT AND GENERAL WORKERS' UNION
Subject:
1. Claim for disturbance payment compensation.
Labour Court Recommendation No. 10,996 A/L.
Dear Mr. Cramp,
I refer to Labour Court hearing between the above mentioned
parties on 4th February, 1987. The Court recommends as follows:-
" The Court having considered the submissions from the parties is
of the view that it would not be justified in recommending
payment for disturbance in this case and accordingly does not
recommend concession of the claim."
~
Signed on behalf of the Labour Court.
Evelyn Owens
___________________
Deputy Chairman.