Labour Court Database __________________________________________________________________________________ File Number: CD92129 Case Number: LCR13581 Section / Act: S26(1) Parties: CENTRAL BANK OF IRELAND - and - SERVICES INDUSTRIAL PROFESSIONAL AND TECHNICAL UNION |
Labour Court investigation arising out of LCR13230.
Recommendation:
3. 1. The Court, in the light of the proposals agreed by the
parties, subsequent to the issue of it's previous
recommendation no. LCR13531, which incorporated modifications
to the Banks original proposals as outlined in their
submission to the Court at the previous hearing, does not find
any grounds for further increasing the award made in that
recommendation. The Court therefore again recommends that
the changes in work practices be implemented in full and that
the rates of pay be increased in accordance with that
recommendation.
2. Overtime Earnings and Holiday Pay.
In regard to the affect the proposed working may have on
overtime earnings the Court notes the concern expressed by the
employees as to the recommended period of 12 months over which
the loss if any would be calculated. To address these
concerns the Court would not consider it contrary to their
previous recommendation for the loss of overtime to be
monitored and in the event of the loss being in excess of 10%
of the overtime earnings in the same period in 1991
compensation being paid after six months. The situation to be
reviewed after a period of twelve months and losses incurred
compensated up to a maximum of one and a quarter years.
3. Holiday pay for the leave year 1992 should not be less
than that paid to each individual employee in 1991 increased
by the 6% already recommended.
The Court so recommends.
Division: MrMcGrath Mr McHenry Mr Devine
Text of Document__________________________________________________________________
CD92129 RECOMMENDATION NO. LCR13581
THE LABOUR COURT
INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS ACTS, 1946 TO 1976
SECTION 26 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS ACT, 1990
PARTIES: CENTRAL BANK OF IRELAND
AND
SERVICES INDUSTRIAL PROFESSIONAL AND TECHNICAL UNION
SUBJECT:
1. Labour Court investigation arising out of LCR13230.
BACKGROUND:
2. A Labour Court investigation into the above dispute took place
on 2nd March, 1992. The recommendation as set out below was
issued to the parties on 4th March, 1992.
The Court has taken account of all of the aspects of the case
referred to by the parties in their oral and written submissions.
RECOMMENDATION:
3. 1. The Court, in the light of the proposals agreed by the
parties, subsequent to the issue of it's previous
recommendation no. LCR13531, which incorporated modifications
to the Banks original proposals as outlined in their
submission to the Court at the previous hearing, does not find
any grounds for further increasing the award made in that
recommendation. The Court therefore again recommends that
the changes in work practices be implemented in full and that
the rates of pay be increased in accordance with that
recommendation.
2. Overtime Earnings and Holiday Pay.
In regard to the affect the proposed working may have on
overtime earnings the Court notes the concern expressed by the
employees as to the recommended period of 12 months over which
the loss if any would be calculated. To address these
concerns the Court would not consider it contrary to their
previous recommendation for the loss of overtime to be
monitored and in the event of the loss being in excess of 10%
of the overtime earnings in the same period in 1991
compensation being paid after six months. The situation to be
reviewed after a period of twelve months and losses incurred
compensated up to a maximum of one and a quarter years.
3. Holiday pay for the leave year 1992 should not be less
than that paid to each individual employee in 1991 increased
by the 6% already recommended.
The Court so recommends.
~
Signed on behalf of the Labour Court
Tom McGrath
4th March, 1992 -------------
J.F/U.S. Deputy Chairman