Correcting Order
EMPLOYMENT APPEALS TRIBUNAL
CLAIM(S) OF: CASE NO.
UD1107/2012
Employee - claimant
against
Employer - respondent
under
UNFAIR DISMISSALS ACTS, 1977 TO 2007
I certify that the Tribunal
(Division of Tribunal)
Chairman: Mr. P. O’Leary B.L.
Members: Mr. J. O’Neill
Mr. C. Ryan
heard this claim at Dublin on 21st November 2013
Representation:
Claimant(s) : Ms. MP Guinness BL instructed by:
Ms. Niamh McKenna, O’Mara Geraghty McCourt, Solicitors,
51, Northumberland Road, Dublin 4
Respondent(s) : Colleen Cleary, Solicitors, 127, Lower Baggot Street, Dublin 2
This is a correcting order and should be read in conjunction with the original order dated 29th November 2013. The determination should read as follows and not that in the original order.
The determination of the Tribunal was as follows:-
Determination:
The claimant was made redundant on the 20th November 2011.
Sealed with the Seal of the
Employment Appeals Tribunal
This ________________________
(Sgd.) ________________________
(CHAIRMAN)
EMPLOYMENT APPEALS TRIBUNAL
CLAIM(S) OF: CASE NO.
UD1107/2012
Employee - claimant
against
Employer - respondent
under
UNFAIR DISMISSALS ACTS, 1977 TO 2007
I certify that the Tribunal
(Division of Tribunal)
Chairman: Mr. P. O’Leary B.L.
Members: Mr. J. O’Neill
Mr. C. Ryan
heard this claim at Dublin on 21st November 2013
Representation:
Claimant(s) : Ms. MP Guinness BL instructed by:
Ms. Niamh McKenna, O’Mara Geraghty McCourt, Solicitors,
51, Northumberland Road, Dublin 4
Respondent(s) : Colleen Cleary, Solicitors, 127, Lower Baggot Street, Dublin 2
The determination of the Tribunal was as follows:-
Background:
The respondent (employee) was employed from November 1990 until he was made redundant on the 20th November 2012. At this time he had been employed as the UK Divisional Manager.
Determination:
The respondent in this case did not contest the claim under the Unfair Dismissals Acts, 1977 to 2007 and conceded that the dismissal was unfair on procedural grounds. The parties agreed the claimant’s loss under this Act. The Tribunal questioned the parties in respect of the remedy under the Act and both stated that their option was compensation.
Having considered the options the Tribunal find that compensation is the most suitable remedy and award the sum of € 67,852.00.
Sealed with the Seal of the
Employment Appeals Tribunal
This ________________________
(Sgd.) ________________________
(CHAIRMAN)