FULL RECOMMENDATION
INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS ACTS, 1946 TO 1990 SECTION 20(1), INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS ACT, 1969 PARTIES : NINE ONE ONE RETAIL LIMITED - AND - A WORKER DIVISION : Chairman: Mr Hayes Employer Member: Mr Murphy Worker Member: Ms Tanham |
1. Holiday pay.
BACKGROUND:
2. On the 1st May 2014 the Worker referred the issue to the Labour Court, in accordance with Section 20(1) of the Industrial Relations Act, 1969. A Labour Court hearing took place on the 26th June, 2014. Both parties were informed by letter dated 8th May, 2014 of the time and place of the Labour Court hearing.
The Worker agreed to be bound by the Court’s Recommendation.
RECOMMENDATION:
The case came before the Court under Section 20(1) of the Act. The Claimant was neither present nor represented when the case came on for hearing. Accordingly, no evidence of a dispute between the parties was presented to the Court.
In the absence of any evidence of a dispute the Court does not recommend concession of the Worker's claim.
The Court so recommends.
Signed on behalf of the Labour Court
Brendan Hayes
27th June, 2014______________________
JFDeputy Chairman
NOTE
Enquiries concerning this Recommendation should be addressed to John Foley, Court Secretary.