ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION
Adjudication Decision Reference: ADJ-00002649
Complaint(s)/Dispute(s) for Resolution:
Act | Complaint/Dispute Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under Section 8 of the Unfair Dismissals Act, 1977 | CA-00003603-001 | 31/03/2016 |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 27 of the Organisation of Working Time Act, 1997 | CA-00003603-002 | 31/03/2016 |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 77 of the Employment Equality Act, 1998. (Withdrawn.) | CA-00003603-003 | 31/03/2016 |
Date of Adjudication Hearing: 03/08/2016
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Roger McGrath
Procedure:
In accordance with Section 41(4) of the Workplace Relations Act, 2015, Section 8 of the Unfair Dismissals Act, 1977, and Section 27 of the Organisation of Working Time Act, 1997 following the referral of the complaint(s)/dispute(s) to me by the Director General, I inquired into the complaint(s)/dispute(s) and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the complaint(s)/dispute(s).
Attendance at Hearing:
By | Complainant | Respondent |
Parties | An employee (No Show) | A Catering company |
Complainant’s Submission and Presentation:
The Complainant did not attend the hearing. |
Respondent’s Submission and Presentation:
The Respondent did attend the Hearing but was not required to give evidence.
Decision:
Section 41(4) of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint(s)/dispute(s) in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under Schedule 6 of that Act and the relevant sections of the Unfair Dismissals Act 1977, and the Organisation of Working Time Act, 1997.
Issues for Decision:
Unfair Dismissal & Working Hours.
Legislation involved and requirements of legislation:
The Unfair Dismissals Act, 1977 and the Organisation of Working Time Act, 1997.
Decision:
As the Complainant did not attend and no explanation was forthcoming the claims are dismissed for want of prosecution.
Dated: 7/11/2016