ADJUDICATION OFFICER RECOMMENDATION
Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00006735
Parties:
| Complainant | Respondent |
Anonymised Parties | An Employee | A Pharmaceutical Company |
Dispute for Resolution:
Act | Complaint/Dispute Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 13 of the Industrial Relations Act, 1969 | CA-00009145-001 | 18/01/2017 |
Date of Adjudication Hearing: 23/03/2017
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Pat Brady
Location of Hearing: Room 4.02 Lansdowne House
Procedure:
In accordance Section 13 of the Industrial Relations Acts 1946 – 2015 following the referral of the dispute to me by the Director General, I inquired into the dispute and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the dispute
Summary of Complainant’s Case:
The complainant did not attend the hearing. |
Summary of Respondent’s Case:
The respondent did not attend the hearing. |
Findings and Conclusions:
No reasonable explanation was offered for the non-attendance of the complainant and his case falls for the want of prosecution |
Decision:
Section 13 of the Industrial Relations Acts, 1946 – 2015 requires that I make a recommendation in relation to the dispute.]
For the reason set out above I do not uphold complaint CA-00009145 and it is dismissed. |
Dated: 27th April 2017
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Pat Brady
Key Words:
Industrial relations. non-appearance of complainant |