ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION
Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00007398
| Complainant | Respondent |
Anonymised Parties | An Analyst | A Software Company |
Complaint(s):
Act | Complaint/Dispute Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 6 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1991 | CA-00009946-001 | 28/02/2017 |
Date of Adjudication Hearing: 28/06/2017
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Michael McEntee
Procedure:
In accordance with Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act, 2015 and Section 6 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1991 following the referral of the complaint(s)/dispute(s) to me by the Director General, I inquired into the complaint(s)/dispute(s) and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the complaint(s)/dispute(s).
1: Summary of Complainant’s Case:
Did not attend the Hearing. No evidence presented. |
2: Summary of Respondent’s Case:
As no Complainant case was advanced and no evidence given the Respondent was not required to give any evidence. |
3: Findings and Conclusions:
Case is dismissed for want of Prosecution. I was happy that all parties had been notified of the case. |
4: Decision:
Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 and Section 6 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1991 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint(s)/dispute(s) in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under Schedule 6 of that Act.
Act | Complaint/Dispute Reference No. | Decision |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 6 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1991 | CA-00009946-001 | Case dismissed for want of prosecution. |
Dated: 24th August 2017
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Michael McEntee
Key Words:
|