FULL RECOMMENDATION
MINIMUM NOTICE AND TERMS OF EMPLOYMENT ACTS, 1973 TO 2005 PARTIES : TESCO IRELAND LIMITED (REPRESENTED BY IBEC) - AND - BARBARA MACIEJEWSKA (REPRESENTED BY INDEPENDENT WORKERS UNION) DIVISION : Chairman: Mr Foley Employer Member: Ms Doyle Worker Member: Ms Tanham |
1. Appeal of Adjudication Officer's Decision No: ADJ-00001541.
BACKGROUND:
2. The Worker appealed the Decision of the Adjudication Officer to the Labour Court in accordance with Section 44 of the Workplace Relations Act, 2015. A Labour Court hearing took place on 13 December 2017. The following is the Court's Determination:
DETERMINATION:
This matter comes before the Court as an appeal of a decision of an Adjudication Officer in a complaint by Barbara Maciejewska (the Appellant) made on 21stJanuary 2016 under the Minimum Notice and Terms of Employment Act, 1973-2015 (the Act) that her former employer TESCO Ireland (the Respondent) had failed to provide her statutory entitlement to notice on the termination of her employment.
The Adjudication Officer, in a decision dated 7thJuly 2016, found that the complaint under the Act failed.
The appeal to the Court was received on 17thAugust 2016.
Position of the Appellant
The Appellant contended that upon her dismissal she was entitled to receive one week’s notice. She submitted that she had no knowledge of receipt by her of one week’s pay following 21stJuly 2015.
Position of the Respondent
The Respondent submitted details of payments to the Appellant following 21stJuly 2015. In particular the respondent submitted a payslip dated 25thJuly 2015 and an electronic payslip dated 1stAugust 2015. The Respondent submitted that those payslips demonstrated payment by the Respondent to the Appellant of one weeks wages following 21stJuly 2015.
The Law
The Act at section 4 provides as follows:
- 4.—(1) An employer shall, in order to terminate the contract of employment of an employee who has been in his continuous service for a period of thirteen weeks or more, give to that employee a minimum period of notice calculated in accordance with the provisions of subsection (2) of this section.
(2) The minimum notice to be given by an employer to terminate the contract of employment of his employee shall be—
- (a) if the employee has been in the continuous service of his employer for less than two years, one week,
(b) if the employee has been in the continuous service of his employer for two years or more, but less than five years, two weeks,
(c) if the employee has been in the continuous service of his employer for five years or more, but less than ten years, four weeks,
(d) if the employee has been in the continuous service of his employer for ten years or more, but less than fifteen years, six weeks,
(e) if the employee has been in the continuous service of his employer for fifteen years or more, eight weeks.
- (a) if the employee has been in the continuous service of his employer for less than two years, one week,
It is common case that at a meeting on 21stJuly 2015 the Appellant was informed that she was dismissed and that she would receive payment in respect of one week’s notice. The dismissal was confirmed in writing by letter dated 22ndJuly 2015.
The Respondent produced to the Court evidence of payment on 25thJuly 2015 covering the period from 21stJuly to 25thJuly 2015. The Appellant confirmed receipt of the money involved to the Court.
The Respondent also produced evidence to the Court of a further payment on 1stAugust covering the period up to 28thJuly. The Appellant also confirmed receipt of this payment to the Court.
The Court accepts that the Respondent did not supply the Appellant with clear detail as regards the payment made to her on 1stAugust 2015. Nevertheless, on the basis of the submissions of the parties and the acknowledgement of payments received by the Appellant, the Court concludes that no breach of the Act has occurred.
Determination
The Court determines that the Appellant received all notice payments due to her under the Act. The decision of the Adjudication Officer is affirmed and the appeal fails.
The Court so determines.
Signed on behalf of the Labour Court
Kevin Foley
19 December 2017.______________________
MNChairman
NOTE
Enquiries concerning this Determination should be addressed to John Deegan, Court Secretary.