ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION

Adjudication Decision Reference: ADJ-00002497

Complaints for Resolution:

Act	Complaint/Dispute Reference No.	Date of Receipt
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 27 of the Organisation of Working Time Act, 1997	CA-00003390-001	21/03/2016
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 6 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1991	CA-00003390-003	21/03/2016
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 27 of the Organisation of Working Time Act, 1997	CA-00003390-004	21/03/2016
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 6 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1991	CA-00003390-005	21/03/2016
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 27 of the Organisation of Working Time Act, 1997	CA-00003390-006	21/03/2016
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under Section 11 of the Minimum Notice & Terms of Employment Act, 1973	CA-00003390-007	21/03/2016

Venue; Ashdown Park Hotel, Gorey, Co Wexford

Date of Adjudication Hearing: 29/11/2016

Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Eugene Hanly

Procedure:

In accordance with Section 41(4) of the Workplace Relations Act, following the referral of the complaints to me by the Director General, I inquired into the complaints and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the complaints.

Background

The Complainant was employed as a Bar Manager from 8th October 2015 to 15^th March 2016. She has claimed that she did not get a Sunday premium, was not properly compensated for Public Holidays, did not get breaks, is owed wages and did not get minimum notice.

1) Organisation of Working Time Act CA-00003390-001/004/006

2) Payment of Wages Act CA-00003390-003/005

3) Minimum Notice & Terms of Employment Act CA-00003390-007

Complainant’s Submission and Presentation:

The Complainant did not attend and was not represented.

Respondent’s Submission and Presentation:

The Complainant did not attend and was not represented.

Findings

I note the correspondence on file notifying both parties of this hearing.

I note that neither party to this dispute attended the hearing.

I find that the Complainant did not prosecute her complaints on this day.

Decision:

Section 41(4) of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaints in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under Schedule 6 of that Act.

I have decided that these complaints fail for want of prosecution.

Dated: 4^th May 2017