ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION

 Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00008319

Parties:

Complaint:

Date of Adjudication Hearing: 23rd August 2017.

Procedure:

In accordance with Section 80 of the Workplace Relations Act 2015, Section 39 of the Redundancy Payment Act 1967 and following the referral of the complaint to me by the Director General, I inquired into the complaint and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the complaint.

Background:

The Complainant was submitting that he had not been paid his statutory redundancy payments when his employment was terminated by the Respondent by way and reason of redundancy.

Summary of Complainant’s Case:

The Complainant was submitting that he had not been paid his statutory redundancy payment by the Respondent when his employment was terminated by way of redundancy by the Respondent.

The Complainant said that he was employed by the Respondent from 7^th November 2005 to 26^th October 2016 and that his normal weekly rate of pay was €400.00c.

The Complainant said that his employment was terminated by reason or way of redundancy on 24^th October 2016 when the Respondent closed down the employment, without notice with the loss of all jobs.   The Complainant submitted that what occurred was plainly a redundancy as defined by the Redundancy Payment Acts; however he was not paid his statutory redundancy by the Respondent, despite strenuous efforts on his part and on the part of his colleagues.

The Complainant confirmed that there was no break in his continuity of employment in the period from 7^th November 2005 to and 26^th October 2016.

The Complainant sought a favourable decision that he was entitled to his statutory redundancy payment.

Summary of Respondent’s Case:

The Respondent was not present or represented at the Hearing and they sent no submissions.

Findings and Decision:

Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under Schedule 6 of that Act.

Section 39 of the Redundancy Payments Acts 1967, requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under that Act.

The Respondent was not present or represented at the Hearing and they sent no submissions, accordingly, I only have the evidence and submissions of the Complainant to rely upon in these matters.

Based on the uncontested evidence of the Complainant the following facts were established at the Hearing:

• The Complainant was employed by the Respondent on a period of unbroken continuous service from 7^th November 2005 to 24^th October 2015.

• The Complainant’s normal weekly rate of pay was €400.00c gross

• The Complainant submitted his complaint/claim to the WRC on 25^th April 2017

Based on the foregoing, I find and declare that the complaint under Section 39 of the Redundancy Payments Act 1967 is well founded and it is upheld.   I require the Respondent to pay the Complainant his statutory redundancy payment based on his weekly wage of €400.00c and his continuous unbroken service from 7^th November 2005 to 24^th October 2015.

Dated:   11 September 2017