ADJUDICATION OFFICER RECOMMENDATION
Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00009597
Parties:
| Complainant | Respondent |
Anonymised Parties | A Metal Fabricator | A Manufacturing Company |
Complaint(s):
Act | Complaint/Dispute Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under the Industrial Relations Acts | CA-00012622-001 | 18/07/2017 |
Date of Adjudication Hearing: 28/11/2017
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: John Tierney
Procedure:
In accordance with Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act, 2015 [ and/or Section 13 of the Industrial Relations Acts 1969] following the referral of the complaint(s)/dispute(s) to me by the Director General, I inquired into the complaint(s)/dispute(s) and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the complaint(s)/dispute(s).
Background:
The Claimant is claiming unfair dismissal. |
Summary of Complainant’s Case:
There was an unexplained absence of the Claimant. |
Summary of Respondent’s Case:
There was an unexplained absence of the Respondent. |
Recommendation:
Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint(s)/dispute(s) in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under Schedule 6 of that Act.
Section 13 of the Industrial Relations Acts, 1969 requires that I make a recommendation in relation to the dispute.
As there was an unexplained absence of the Claimant the claim fails for lack of prosecution. |
Dated: 9th August 2018
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: John Tierney
Key Words:
Unfair dismissal. |