ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION
Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00011407
Parties:
| Complainant | Respondent |
Anonymised Parties | Office Assistant | Restaurant |
Complaint:
Act | Complaint/Dispute Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under Section 39 of the Redundancy Payments Act, 1967 | CA-00014802-001 | 05/10/2017 |
Date of Adjudication Hearing: 08/01/2018
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Eugene Hanly
Procedure:
In accordance with Section 39 of the Redundancy Payments Acts 1967 - 2014following the referral of the complaint to me by the Director General, I inquired into the complaint and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the complaint.
Background:
The Complainant was employed as an Office Assistant from 16TH April 2005 to 12th January 2016. She worked 10.5 Hours per week and was paid €91.50 per week. She has claimed that she did not receive statutory redundancy payment. |
Summary of Complainant’s Case:
Request to extend the time limit The Complainant stated that she was notified by her former employer that the business was in liquidation on 15th January 2016. She received notification from the Liquidator that the business was in liquidation with effect from 12th January 2016. The Liquidator advised her that any outstanding wages and her statutory redundancy would be processed. She received outstanding wages but did not get statutory redundancy. She was not given a RP50 either. She wrote to the Liquidator but received no response from them. Her colleagues received redundancy but she didn’t. She continued to write to the Liquidator protesting over their failure to process the redundancy payments. It was not until 12th April 2017 that she received forms RP50 and IP1. She signed them and sent them back. She later received confirmation from the Department that her claim was outside the 12 months’ time limit. She has sought an extension to the time limit. Decision on request to extend the time limit. I have considered the evidence before this hearing. I am satisfied that the Complainant made a concerted effort for a considerable period of time to receive her statutory redundancy as others had received it. I’m satisfied that she has established cause to extend the time limit by one year. The complaint was received by the WRC on 5th October 2017 therefore the period that may be investigated is back to 6th October 2015. This period now incorporates the date of redundancy on 12th January 2016. |
Complaint
The Complainant stated that her position was made redundant on 12th January 2016. She did not receive statutory redundancy. She has claimed statutory redundancy as per the terms of the Act.
Summary of Respondent’s Case:
The Liquidator was not in attendance or represented at the hearing. |
Findings and Conclusions:
I find that a genuine redundancy has occurred. I find that the Complainant is entitled to statutory redundancy. I find that the start date was 16th April 2005. I find that the termination date was 12th January 2016. I find that the gross Pay was €91.50 per week. Any award under the Redundancy Payments Act is subject to the Complainant having been in insurable employment for the relevant period under the Social Welfare Acts.
|
Decision:
Section 39 of the Redundancy Payments Acts 1967 – 2012 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under that Act.
I have decided that the Complainant is entitled to statutory redundancy as per the Redundancy Payments At.
I order the Respondent to pay the Complainant her statutory redundancy entitlements within six weeks of the date below.
Dated: 2nd February 2018
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Eugene Hanly
Key Words:
Redundancy payment |