ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION

Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00010817

	Complainant	Respondent
Anonymised Parties	A Dentist	A Dental Clinic

Representatives

Complaint(s):

Act	Complaint/Dispute Reference No.	Date of Receipt
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 6 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1991	CA-00014218-001	25/09/2017

Date of Adjudication Hearing: 20/02/2018

Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Michael McEntee

Procedure:

In accordance with Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act, 2015 and Section 6 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1991 following the referral of the complaint(s)/dispute(s) to me by the Director General, I inquired into the complaint(s)/dispute(s) and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the complaint(s)/dispute(s).

Background:

The Dispute concerns a wage payment issue between a Dentist and a Dental Clinic.

1: Summary of Complainant’s Case:

Did not appear – no evidence presented.

2: Summary of Respondent’s Case:

Did not appear – no evidence presented.

3: Findings and Conclusions:

As neither party attended the oral hearing and I was satisfied that proper notice had been served I dismissed the case for want of prosecution.

4: Decision:

Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 and Section 6 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1991 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint(s)/dispute(s) in accordance with the relevant redress provisions of the cited Acts.

Act	Complaint/Dispute Reference No.	Summary decision. Refer to Section 3 above for detailed reasoning.
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 6 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1991	CA-00014218-001	Case dismissed for want of prosecution.

Dated: 31st July 2018

Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Michael McEntee

Key Words: