ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION
Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00012664
Parties:
| Complainant | Respondent |
Anonymised Parties | A Consultant | A Restaurant |
Complaint:
Act | Complaint Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 6 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1991 | CA-00016694-001 | 09/01/2018 |
Date of Adjudication Hearing: 11/04/2018
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer:Pat Brady
Procedure:
In accordance with Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act, 2015 following the referral of the complaint to me by the Director General, I inquired into the complaint and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the complaint.
Summary of Complainant’s Case:
The complainant did not attend the hearing. |
Summary of Respondent’s Case:
The respondent did not attend the hearing. |
Findings and Conclusions:
As the complainant did not attend the hearing and as no explanation was provided for the failure to do so the complaint falls for want of prosecution. |
Decision:
Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under Schedule 6 of that Act.
As the complainant did not attend to present the complaint it falls for want of prosecution. CA-00016694-001 is dismissed |
Dated: 31st July, 2018
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer:Pat Brady
Key Words:
Non-attendance of complainant. |