ADJUDICATION OFFICER RECOMMENDATION
Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00013037
Parties:
| Worker | Employer |
Anonymised Parties | General Operative | Construction Company |
Dispute
Act | Dispute Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Dispute seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under the Industrial Relations Acts | CA-00017159-001 | 30/01/2018 |
Date of Adjudication Hearing: 11/07/2018
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Marie Flynn
Procedure:
In accordance with Section 13 of the Industrial Relations Act 1969following the referral of the dispute to me by the Director General, I inquired into the dispute and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the dispute.
Background:
The worker was employed by the employer for less than one month. He submitted a claim for unfair dismissal under the Industrial Relations Act 1969. |
Summary of Worker’s Case:
The worker did not attend the hearing. |
Summary of Employer’s Case:
The employer attended the hearing. |
Findings and Conclusions:
I find that the dispute under Section 13 of the Industrial Relations Act 1969 fails for lack of prosecution. |
Recommendation:
Section 13 of the Industrial Relations Acts, 1969 requires that I make a recommendation in relation to the dispute.
I find that the dispute under Section 13 of the Industrial Relations Act 1969 fails for lack of prosecution. |
Dated: 31st July 2018.
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Marie Flynn
Key Words:
Lack of prosecution |