ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION/RECOMMENDATION
Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00013547
Parties:
| Complainant | Respondent |
Anonymised Parties | An employee | An employer |
Complaint(s):
Act | Complaint/Dispute Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 27 of the Organisation of Working Time Act, 1997 | CA-00017734-003 | 03/03/2018 |
Date of Adjudication Hearing: 01/06/2018
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Jim Dolan
Procedure:
In accordance with Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act, 2015 following the referral of the complaint to me by the Director General, I inquired into the complaint and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the complaint.
Background:
The Complainant was employed as a General Operative with the Respondent from 14/08/2017 and left on 15/02/2018. The Complainant is Croatian national and was employed by the Respondent as a result of the Respondent’s recruitment campaign in that country. The Complainant lodges a complaint with the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) on 03/03/2018. His complaint, under s. 27 of the Organisation of Working Time Act, 1997 alleges that he had not received his Public Holiday entitlement, at hearing it became apparent that the Complainant was looking for 4 days unpaid wages and 9.5 days holiday entitlement. |
Summary of Complainant’s Case:
The Complainant alleges that he signed the terms of the relocation agreement and was not issued with a copy of this, he had been issued with a copy of all other documentation. It is the Complainant’s argument that he was not aware of possibility of having to repay this loan. As the Complainant is alleging that he was not paid his final annual leave entitlement and four days wages from around the time he left employment. |
Summary of Respondent’s Case:
1. The complainant signed a contract of employment with the respondent dated August 16, 2017. 2. In accepting the respondent's offer of employment, the complainant was offered and accepted the benefit of the respondent's Relocation Funding. This agreement set out the terms of reimbursement for travel and accommodation expenses up to a maximum of €1,000, vouched by receipts. The agreement specified that: In the event that I voluntarily terminate my employment with Musgrave within twenty-four months of the effective date in my new position...I will repay Musgrave for all relocation benefits and training / induction costs provided by Musgrave Ltd in connection with the relocation and commencement of my employment. (Maximum €1,000 see above). Repayment will be according to the following schedule: · Termination within first year 100% · Termination within 15 months 75% · Termination within 18 months 50% · Termination within 24 months 25% · Termination after 2 years 0%
3. The complainant resigned his employment with the respondent by way of email on February 7, 2018 giving one week's notice. His employment ended February 15, 2018. His resignation was acknowledged by email on February 8, 2018. 4. At the time of his resignation the complainant had accrued 71.25 annual leave hours. 5. As per the terms of the relocation agreement €792.71 was deducted from the complainant's last payslip. This deduction was listed on the complainant's final payslip. The position was clarified for the complainant by way of letter dated March 20, 2018. 6. As of the date of writing the balance of €207.29 is still owed to the respondent.
Respondent’s Arguments
Conclusion As we have shown the complainant received his annual leave, Public Holiday entitlements and received payment for all days he worked with the respondent. The deductions made from his final pay were lawful and agreed with the complainant.
|
Findings and Conclusions:
I have looked at the Respondent’s submission and listened carefully to the Complainant. I am satisfied that the Complainant was paid all monies owed to him but was unaware that he would have to re-pay the re-location monies paid to him around the time he commenced employment. In relation to the repayment of this relocation loan the Respondent has acted in accordance with the agreed procedure. |
Decision:
Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under Schedule 6 of that Act.
There has been no wrong doing by the Respondent and I therefore have no alternative but to deem the complaint as a failure. |
Dated: 26th July 2018
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Jim Dolan
Key Words: