ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION/RECOMMENDATION
Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00010519
Parties:
| Complainant | Respondent |
Anonymised Parties | A chef | A bar and restaurant |
Complaint(s):
Act | Complaint/Dispute Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under Section 39 of the Redundancy Payments Act, 1967 | CA-00013970-001 | 15/09/2017 |
Date of Adjudication Hearing: 11/12/2017
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Catherine Byrne
Procedure:
In accordance with Section 39 of the Redundancy Payments Acts 1967 – 2014, following the referral of the complaint to me by the Director General, I inquired into the complaint and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the complaint.
The complainant attended the hearing at the Workplace Relations Commission on December 11th 2017, represented by Ann Conan of the Bray Citizen’s Information Centre. The respondent did not attend.
Background:
The respondent’s bar and restaurant in Wicklow was closed down in March 2017. The complainant was given notice of redundancy on February 1st. He worked his notice and his employment was terminated on February 17th. He had 2.09 years of service, having been employed from January 17th 2015. He earned €301 per week. |
Summary of Complainant’s Case:
The complainant was not paid his statutory redundancy pay. |
Summary of Respondent’s Case:
The respondent did not attend the hearing and was not represented. |
Findings and Conclusions:
Section 7(1) of the Redundancy Payments Act 1967 (amended) provides that; “An employee, if he is dismissed by his employer by reason of redundancy or is laid off or kept on short time for the minimum period, shall, subject to this Act, be entitled to the payment of moneys which shall be known as ….redundancy payment provided - a) he has been employed for the requisite period, and b) he was an employed contributor in employment which was insurable for all benefits under the Social Welfare Acts 1952 – 1966, immediately before the date of the termination of his employment or had ceased to be ordinarily employed in employment which was so insurable in the period of four years ending on that date.” The complainant had more than two years’ service with the respondent when the business closed down. Based on the information presented to me at the hearing, it is evident that he was in insurable employment and that he was made redundant with effect from February 17th 2017. He is therefore entitled to a statutory redundancy payment. |
Decision:
Section 39 of the Redundancy Payments Acts 1967 – 2012 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under that Act.
Two complaints were submitted in respect of this matter, the non-payment of statutory redundancy. The other complaint is ADJ-00010536. From the evidence presented at the hearing, and specifically, from information on the complainant’s P45, it is apparent that the correct respondent is cited on ADJ-00010536. Therefore, redress must be sought in accordance with ADJ-00010536 and this complaint fails. |
Dated: 02 May 2018
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Catherine Byrne
Key Words:
Statutory redundancy |