ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION
Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00002792
Parties:
| Complainant | Respondent |
Anonymised Parties | An Employee | A Cleaning Company |
Complaints:
Act | Complaint Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 77 of the Employment Equality Act, 1998 | CA-00003836-001 | 14/04/2016 |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under Section 28 of the Safety, Health & Welfare at Work Act, 2005 | CA-00003836-002 | 14/04/2016 |
Date of Adjudication Hearing: 29/09/2016
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Pat Brady
Procedure:
In accordance with Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act, following the referral of the complaints to me by the Director General, I inquired into the complaints and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the complaints.
Background:
|
Summary of Complainant’s Case:
The complainant did not attend the hearing. His representative attended but no explanation was offered for his failure to attend |
Summary of Respondent’s Case:
The respondent was in attendance. |
Findings and Conclusions:
As the complainant did not attend the hearing his complaints fall for want of prosecution. |
Decision:
Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaints in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under Schedule 6 of that Act.
For the reason set out above I do not uphold complaints CA000003836-001 and 002 and they are dismissed. |
Dated: 2/11/18
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Pat Brady
Key Words:
Non-attendance of complainant. |