ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION/RECOMMENDATION
Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00016115
Parties:
| Complainant | Respondent |
Anonymised Parties | An Employee | A Company |
Representatives |
|
|
Complaint(s):
Act | Complaint/Dispute Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under Section 39 of the Redundancy Payments Act, 1967 | CA-00020957-001 | 02/08/2018 |
Date of Adjudication Hearing:28/09/2018
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Niamh O'Carroll Kelly
Procedure:
In accordance withSection 39 of the Redundancy Payments Acts 1967 - 2014following the referral of the complaint to me by the Director General, I inquired into the complaint and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the complaint.
Summary of Complainant’s Case:
No Appearance. |
Summary of Respondent’s Case:
The case should be struck out for want of prosecution. Furthermore, the named respondent, is not and was not the complainant’s employer. |
Findings and Conclusions:
There was no appearance for or on behalf of the complainant. I am satisfied that the complainant was on notice of the date, time and venue for the hearing. On that basis I am dismissing the claim. |
Decision:
Section 39 of the Redundancy Payments Acts 1967 – 2012 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under that Act.
I dismiss the claim for want of prosecution.
|
Dated: 3rd October, 2018
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Niamh O'Carroll Kelly
Key Words:
|