ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION
Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00013035
Parties:
| Complainant | Respondent |
Anonymised Parties | A Worker | An Outsourcing Company |
Representatives |
|
|
Complaint(s):
Act | Complaint/Dispute Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 27 of the Organisation of Working Time Act, 1997 | CA-00017148-001 | 30/01/2018 |
Date of Adjudication Hearing: 20/06/2018
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: David Mullis
Procedure:
In accordance with Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act, 2015 and Section 27 of the Organisation of Working Time Act, 1997, following the referral of the complaint to me by the Director General.
Background:
Neither the Complainant or the Respondent attended the hearing. I am satisfied that both were duly notified of the date, time and location of the hearing. |
|
Summary of Complainant’s Case:
The complaint did not attend and no explanation has been furnished in respect of that failure. |
Summary of Respondent’s Case:
The respondent did not attend |
Findings and Conclusions:
As no submission was presented by the Complainant I find that the complaint fails for want of prosecution. |
Decision:
Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint(s)/dispute(s) in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under Schedule 6 of that Act.
Neither the Complainant or Respondent attended the hearing scheduled for June 20th 2018. As the Complainant has failed to attend to establish the validity of her complaints, I concluded the investigation and find against the Complainant. |
Dated: September 19th 2018
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: David Mullis
Key Words:
|