ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION
Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00017436
Parties:
| Complainant | Respondent |
Anonymised Parties | Employee | Hotel |
Representatives | David O’Regan, B.L. | Shane Cummins |
Complaint:
Act | Complaint/Dispute Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under Section 39 of the Redundancy Payments Act, 1967 | CA-00022560-001 | 10/10/2018 |
Date of Adjudication Hearing: 09/04/2019
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Gaye Cunningham
Procedure:
In accordance with Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act, 2015 and Section 39 of theRedundancy Payments Acts 1967 - 2014 following the referral of the complaint to me by the Director General, I inquired into the complaint and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the complaint .
Background:
The Complainant seeks payment of statutory redundancy payment. |
Summary of Complainant’s Case:
The Complainant was employed by the Respondent from 4th January 1999 to 4th December 2016. The business closed on 4th December 2016 and the Complainant was assured that the relevant redundancy forms had been lodged for his redundancy payment. However, there was some considerable delay in supplying and completing the paperwork on the hotel’s part and a letter was submitted in support of this. The Complainant’s representative sought an extension of time for the application for redundancy payment on the grounds of reasonable cause. |
Summary of Respondent’s Case:
The Respondent agreed that the letters provided reflect the accurate representation of what occurred. The Respondent had no wish to have the Complainant’s statutory redundancy payment delayed or not paid. |
Findings and Conclusions:
It is common case that there was a considerable delay in submitting the correct paperwork in order for the Complainant to receive his redundancy payment. In normal circumstances and in accordance with section 24 (1) of the Redundancy Payments Act as amended the Complainant’s claim for redundancy would have to have been lodged within 52 weeks of the date of his redundancy i.e. by 4th December 2017. In this case, the complaint here was received on 10th October 2018. Section 24 of the Redundancy Payments Act 1967, as amended provides at section 2(A) that an employee may be permitted to make a claim after the expiry of 52 weeks: “(2A) Where an employee who fails to make a claim for a lump sum within the period of 52 weeks mentioned in subsection (1) (as amended) makes such a claim before the end of the period of 104 weeks beginning on the date of the dismissal or the date of termination of employment, the adjudication officer, if he or she is satisfied that the employee would have been entitled to the lump sum and that the failure was due to a reasonable cause, may declare the employee to be entitled to the lump sum and the employee shall thereupon become so entitled”. Having considered the evidence in this case and having regard to the Respondent’s expression of regret for having unwittingly delayed the Complainant’s entitlement, in my view the Complainant has shown reasonable cause for his application for redundancy not being submitted within 52 weeks and the time is therefore extended to 104 weeks. I conclude that the Complainant is entitled to a redundancy lump sum payment of €16,989.51 based on insurable employment with the employer from 4th January 1999 to 4th December 2016. |
Decision:
Section 39 of the Redundancy Payments Acts 1967 – 2012 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under that Act.
I conclude that the Complainant is entitled to a redundancy lump sum payment of €16,989.51 based on insurable employment with the employer from 4th January 1999 to 4th December 2016.
Dated: April 25th 2019
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Gaye Cunningham
Key Words:
Redundancy, extension of time. |