ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION
Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00010503
Parties:
| Complainant | Respondent |
Anonymised Parties | Casino Manager | Casino |
Representatives | Eamonn O'Hanrahan E.M. O'Hanrahan Solicitors |
|
Complaints:
Act | Complaint/Dispute Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 27 of the Organisation of Working Time Act, 1997 | CA-00013999-001 | 27/07/2017 |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 27 of the Organisation of Working Time Act, 1997 | CA-00013999-002 | 27/07/2017 |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 27 of the Organisation of Working Time Act, 1997 | CA-00013999-003 | 27/07/2017 |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 7 of the Terms of Employment (Information) Act, 1994 | CA-00013999-004 | 27/07/2017 |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 27 of the Organisation of Working Time Act, 1997 | CA-00013999-005 | 27/07/2017 |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 27 of the Organisation of Working Time Act, 1997 | CA-00013999-006 | 27/07/2017 |
Date of Adjudication Hearing: 05/06/2018
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Rosaleen Glackin
Procedure:
In accordance with Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act, 2015 and following the referral of the complaints to me by the Director General, a Hearing was scheduled for 5th June 2018. There were two separate complaints submitted under ADJ -00009799 and 00010503. These complaints under the Terms of Employment (Information) Act, 1994 and the Organisation of Working Time Act, 1997 – 2015 were submitted under both ADJ’s and both were submitted on the same date 27th July 2017. All complaints under ADJ 00009799 and ADJ 00010503 were heard on the same day. Decisions have been issued on all the complaints under ADJ 0009799.
The Adjudication Officer sought to verify the legal name of the Employer and the Parties were afforded a short adjournment to verify what the name of the Employer was in relation to the Complaints and both Parties verified the correct name was that as set out above in this Decision.
The Respondent sought an adjournment of the Hearing but I noted there was no request for an adjournment prior to the Hearing and the Respondent did not offer any reason for his request for an adjournment safe to say he had no instructions. The Adjudication Officer indicated her intention to proceed.
DECISION.
Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaints in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under Schedule 6 of that Act.
CA-00013999-001. This complaint is a duplicate of CA-00012817-001
CA-00013991-002. This complaint is a duplicate of CA-00012817-003
CA-00013991-003. This complaint is a duplicate of CA-00012817-004
CA-00013991-004. This complaint is a duplicate of CA-00012817-005
CA-00013991-005This complaint is a duplicate of CA-00012818-001
CA-00013991-006. This complaint is a duplicate of CA-00012818-002
And I find that all are not well founded in the circumstances.