ADJUDICATION OFFICER RECOMMENDATION
Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00017733
Parties:
| Complainant | Respondent |
Anonymised Parties | A Nurse Manager | A Health Provider |
Complaint(s):
Act | Complaint/Dispute Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 13 of the Industrial Relations Act, 1969 | CA-00022878-001 | 26/10/2018 |
Date of Adjudication Hearing: 07/03/2019
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Marian Duffy
Procedure:
In accordance with Section 13 of the Industrial Relations Acts 1969and following the referral of the dispute to me by the Director General, I inquired into the dispute and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the dispute.
Background:
The Complainant is employed by the Respondent as Acting Director of Nursing since 2012. Her union is seeking a recommendation under the Industrial Relations Act that she is appointed to the post in a permanent capacity. |
Summary of Complainant’s Case:
The Complainant is employed by the Respondent as Acting Director of Nursing since 2012. Her union is seeking a recommendation under the Industrial Relations Act that she is appointed to the post in a permanent capacity The Complainant was appointed acting interim Director of Nursing in February 2012 following a successful competition. She was initially appointed on an acting basis pending the advertisement of the substantive post. However, in the period of time from 2012 to 2019 the Respondent has not held a competition for the Director of Nursing post. The Complainant has advocated on several occasions that the post be advertised. In 2015 the Respondent advertised the permanent filling of the post and the Complainant applied for that position. However, the Respondent failed to hold interviews to fill the post and the competition was not progressed. The Union stated that the Respondent’s Guidance document circular 017/ 2013, which issued arising from a collective agreement reached between management and unions, was designed to regularise long-term acting posts is relevant. In 2013 the Complainant did not have qualifying service in an acting post for the regularisation of her acting post. The Union submitted that the Respondent is in breach of the circular which provides for the regularisation of temporary posts and that the Complainants is acting in the post for 7 years, and the circular provides that where temporary occupation of a higher post occurs, it should not exceed 12 months except in exceptional circumstances. No exceptional circumstances exist which justify the failure to fill the post in the normal manner. The Complainant has endeavour herself to have the post filled in the normal manner, however the Respondent has failed to do so without any adequate or indeed any excuse. It is submitted that, in the circumstances, that the Complainant is entitled to a contract of indefinite duration. I was referred to the cases of ADJ-00012940, ADJ-0003150 and the Labour Court recommendation in the case of LCR 21771 which have similar facts to this case. It was submitted that the regularisation of Complainant’s post to a permanent post is cost neutral as she is on an incremental scale. |
Summary of Respondent’s Case:
The Respondent did not dispute the contents of the union submission. It submitted that talks are ongoing at a national level in relation to temporary appointments. It was accepted however that the matter could proceed to hearing under the Industrial Relations Act. |
Findings and Conclusions:
I note that the Complainant was appointed to the temporary position of Director of Nursing in February 2012 and she is now over 7 years in the position. I note that the matter of temporary appointments was the subject of an agreement between management and the trade unions, resulting in the issuing of a Guidance Document Circular 17/2013 by the Respondent, which provides that temporary appointments should not extend beyond 12 months except on an exceptional basis. Having considered the evidence, I am satisfied that the Respondent is in breach of its own rules in relation to temporary appointments and has not put forward an exceptional basis for continuing with the situation. Therefore, in all the circumstances of this case and as a basis for resolving the dispute, I recommend that the Complainant’s employment be regularised as a permanent Director of Nursing with immediate effect. This recommendation reflects the specific circumstances of the Complainant’s position and should not be invoked or relied upon as having wider implications. |
Recommendation:
Section 13 of the Industrial Relations Acts, 1969 requires that I make a recommendation in relation to the dispute.
Therefore, in all the circumstances of this case and as a basis for resolving the dispute, I recommend that the Complainant’s contract of employment be regularised and that she be appointed as a permanent Director of Nursing with immediate effect. This recommendation reflects the specific circumstances of the Complainant’s position and should not be invoked or relied upon as having wider implications. |
Dated: 27/05/19
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Marian Duffy
Key Words:
Industrial Relations, Regularisation of Acting Positions, |