ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION
Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00011107
Parties:
| Complainant | Respondent |
Anonymised Parties | A construction worker | A construction company. |
Representatives | Kevin O'Gorman Kevin O'Gorman Solicitors | Did not attend |
Complaint(s):
Act | Complaint/Dispute Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 7 of the Terms of Employment (Information) Act, 1994 | CA-00014586-001 | 27/09/2017 |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 6 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1991 | CA-00014586-003 | 27/09/2017 |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 27 of the Organisation of Working Time Act, 1997 | CA-00014586-004 | 27/09/2017 |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under Section 12 of the Minimum Notice & Terms of Employment Act, 1973 | CA-00014586-006 | 27/09/2017 |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under Section 8 of the Unfair Dismissals Act, 1977 | CA-00014586-007 | 27/09/2017 |
Date of Adjudication Hearing: 28/10/2020
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Niamh O'Carroll Kelly
Procedure:
In accordance with Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act, 2015 Section 8 of the Unfair Dismissals Acts, 1977 - 2015, following the referral of the complaints to me by the Director General, I inquired into the complaints and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the complaints.
Background:
The complainant alleges that he is owed money in relation to hours worked, holidays and minimum notice. |
Summary of Complainant’s Case:
The complainant withdrew CA 14586 -001 and CA 14586 – 007.
14586 – 003 PW The complainant alleges that he is owed €2,917.19. At the commencement of his employment he agreed a daily rate of €70 with the respondent. He worked six days a week. Based on an analysis of the sums paid compared with the hours worked the complainant has calculated the sum due to be as above. He calculated the sum as follows: Month days worked Sums due February 3 210 March 24 1680 April 25 plus 17.5 O/T 1903.52 May 24 1680 June 25 1750 July 22 1540 August 22 plus 7.5 O/T 1605.62 September 25 1750 October 25 1750 November 27 plus 17.5 O/T 2043.12 December 12 plus 4 O/T 875.00
The total amount due was €5,842.19. The complainant was paid the sum of €2,925.00 leaving a balance of €2,917.19.
14586 – 004 OWT The complainant was never in receipt of holidays or payment in lieu. The complainant calculates based on the number of days worked that he is entitled to € 1233.33 for his annual leave pay. 14586 – 006 MN The complainant’s employer approached him on the 31st December, 2016 and informed him that he was being let go. He was asked to leave that day and was not paid in lieu of Notice. |
Summary of Respondent’s Case:
There was no appearance for or on behalf of the respondent. I am satisfied having made enquires that the respondent was on notice of the date and time of the remote hearing and was in receipt of the remote hearing link. |
Findings and Conclusions:
14586 – 003 I am satisfied that the complainant has correctly calculated the sums due and owing in relation to his wages. He kept diaries of the hours and days worked. Based on his uncontested evidence and the documentation produced, I am satisfied that the complaint is well founded and the complainant is entitled to € 2,917.19. 14586 – 004 Organisation of Working Time Act, 1997 19.— (1) Subject to the First Schedule(which contains transitional provisions in respect of the leave years 1996 to 1998), an employee shall be entitled to paid annual leave (in this Act referred to as “ annual leave”) equal to— ( a) 4 working weeks in a leave year in which he or she works at least 1,365 hours (unless it is a leave year in which he or she changes employment), ( b) one-third of a working week for each month in the leave year in which he or she works at least 117 hours, or ( c) 8 per cent. of the hours he or she works in a leave year (but subject to a maximum of 4 working weeks): Provided that if more than one of the preceding paragraphs is applicable in the case concerned and the period of annual leave of the employee, determined in accordance with each of those paragraphs, is not identical, the annual leave to which the employee shall be entitled shall be equal to whichever of those periods is the greater. F14 [ (1A) For the purposes of this section, a day that an employee was absent from work due to illness shall, if the employee provided to his or her employer a certificate of a registered medical practitioner in respect of that illness, be deemed to be a day on which the employee was — (a) at his or her place of work or at his or her employer’s disposal, and (b) carrying on or performing the activities or duties of his or her work. (2) A day which would be regarded as a day of annual leave shall, if the employee concerned is ill on that day and furnishes to his or her employer a certificate of a registered medical practitioner in respect of his or her illness, not be regarded, for the purposes of this Act, as a day of annual leave. (3) The annual leave of an employee who works 8 or more months in a leave year shall, subject to the provisions of any employment regulation order, registered employment agreement, collective agreement or any agreement between the employee and his or her employer, include an unbroken period of 2 weeks. (4) Notwithstanding subsection (2) or any other provision of this Act but without prejudice to the employee’s entitlements under subsection (1), the reference in subsection (3) to an unbroken period of 2 weeks includes a reference to such a period that includes one or more public holidays or days on which the employee concerned is ill. (5) An employee shall, for the purposes of subsection (1), be regarded as having worked on a day of annual leave the hours he or she would have worked on that day had it not been a day of annual leave. (6) References in this section to a working week shall be construed as references to the number of days that the employee concerned usually works in a week. The complainant worked for 10 months. Allowing for annual leave of one third of a week's pay for each month, approximately 117 hours were worked. The complainant was earning a gross figure of €370 gross per week, net €350.00 he is entitled to €1,230.33 for his annual leave 14586 – 006 Minimum Notice and Terms of Employment Act 1973 4.— (1) An employer shall, in order to terminate the contract of employment of an employee who has been in his continuous service for a period of thirteen weeks or more, give to that employee a minimum period of notice calculated in accordance with the provisions of subsection (2) of this section. (2) The minimum notice to be given by an employer to terminate the contract of employment of his employee shall be— ( a) if the employee has been in the continuous service of his employer for less than two years, one week, The complainant commenced is employment on the 26.02.2016 and his employment was terminated on the 31.12.2016. On that basis, pursuant to Section 4 (2) (a) he is entitled to one weeks’ notice amounting to € 420.00. |
Decision:
Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaints in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under Schedule 6 of that Act and Section 8 of the Unfair Dismissals Acts, 1977 – 2015 requires that I make a decision in relation to the unfair dismissal claim consisting of a grant of redress in accordance with section 7 of the 1977 Act.
14586 – 003 The complaint is well founded. I award the complainant €2,917.19 14586 – 004 The complaint is well founded. I award the complainant €1,233.33 14586 – 006 The complaint is well founded. I award the complainant €420.00 |
Dated: 18th December 2020
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Niamh O'Carroll Kelly
Key Words:
|