ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION
Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00025696
Parties:
| Complainant | Respondent |
Anonymised Parties | Warehouse Operative | Warehousing & Distribution Company |
Complaint:
Act | Complaint/Dispute Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under Section 39 of the Redundancy Payments Act, 1967 | CA-00032685-001 | 03/12/2019 |
Date of Adjudication Hearing: 14/01/2020
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Eugene Hanly
Procedure:
In accordance with Section 39 of the Redundancy Payments Acts 1967 - 2014following the referral of the complaint to me by the Director General, I inquired into the complaint and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the complaint.
Background:
The Complainant was employed as a Warehouse Operative from 13th October 2014 to 15th March 2019. He was paid €367.50 per week. He has claimed that he did not receive his statutory entitlements when the business closed. The Respondent did not attend. |
Summary of Complainant’s Case:
The Complainant stated that he was notified in writing that the business was closing on 15th March 2019. He asked for redundancy payment and the Respondent advised that he would pay it. Following many calls and requests the Respondent never paid it. The Respondent was then requested to sign the relevant forms to allow this payment to be made but the Respondent delayed the process further. Eventually the Respondent signed part of the form but did not confirm in writing that they did not have the funds to pay the redundancy payment. The Complainant was advised that the matter was passed on to his Accountant. The Complainant had no knowledge of who the Accountant was neither his name, company or address. He then filed a claim with the Redundancy payments Section of the Department of Employment Affairs and Social Protection, but it was returned because they had no evidence from the Respondent that they didn’t have funds to pay the redundancy. He is seeking his statutory entitlements to redundancy. |
Summary of Respondent’s Case:
The Respondent did not attend and was not represented at this hearing. |
Findings and Conclusions:
I note that the Respondent’s company has closed down. I note that the Respondent did not attend and was not represented. I find that there was correspondence on file stating the venue, date and time of the hearing. Based on uncontested evidence before this hearing that the business closed down on 15th March 2019. I find that a genuine redundancy existed. I find that the Respondent failed to pay the Complainant his statutory entitlements to redundancy. I find that the Respondent failed to confirm that it didn’t have the ability to pay the redundancy payment. I find that the Complainant has an entitlement to statutory redundancy as per the terms of the Redundancy Payments Act, 1967. I find that the Complainant’s employment commenced on 13th October 2014. I find that the Complainant’s employment ended on 15th March 2019. I find that the Complainant’s weekly gross pay was €367.50. I find that any award under the Redundancy Payments Act is subject to the Complainant having been in insurable employment for the relevant period under the Social Welfare Acts.
|
Decision:
Section 39 of the Redundancy Payments Acts 1967 – 2012 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under that Act.
I have decided that there was a genuine redundancy.
I have decided that the Complainant did not receive his entitlement to statutory redundancy.
I have decided that this claim is well founded.
I have decided that the Respondent should pay the Complainant his statutory entitlements to redundancy within six weeks of todays date.
|
Dated: 27.2.2020
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Eugene Hanly
Key Words:
Statutory redundancy not paid |