ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION
Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00021404
Parties:
| Complainant | Respondent |
Anonymised Parties | {An Administrative Assistant} | {A Charity} |
Representatives | Nicola Coleman |
|
Complaint(s):
Act | Complaint/Dispute Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under Section 8 of the Unfair Dismissals Act, 1977 | CA-00028125-001 | 01/05/2019 |
Date of Adjudication Hearing: 09/10/2019
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Davnet O'Driscoll
Procedure:
In accordance with Section 8 of the Unfair Dismissals Acts, 1977 - 2015, following the referral of the complaint to me by the Director General, I inquired into the complaint and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the complaint.
Background:
The Complainant worked with the Respondent from 23rd April 2007 to 2nd January 2019. |
Summary of Complainant’s Case:
The Complainant was dismissed due to redundancy. She was unfairly selected and the office remains open. |
Summary of Respondent’s Case:
The Respondent says this is a fair dismissal due to redundancy and they complied with fair procedures. |
Findings and Conclusions:
This is a duplicate complaint against the incorrect Respondent. CA-00028125-001 My decision has already been given in CA-00028850-001 against the correct Respondent and accordingly the complaint of unfair dismissal in CA-00028125-001 is not upheld. |
Decision:
Section 8 of the Unfair Dismissals Acts, 1977 – 2015 requires that I make a decision in relation to the unfair dismissal claim consisting of a grant of redress in accordance with section 7 of the 1977 Act.
CA-00028125-001 My decision has already been given in CA-00028850-001 against the correct Respondent and accordingly the complaint of unfair dismissal in CA-00028125-001 is not upheld. |
Dated: 31 July 2020
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Davnet O'Driscoll
Key Words:
Duplicate complaint |