ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION
Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00022012
Parties:
| Complainant | Respondent |
Anonymised Parties | An Employee | An Employer |
Representatives | Robert Purfield SIPTU |
|
Complaint:
Act | Complaint/Dispute Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 6 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1991 | CA-00029027-001 | 13/06/2019 |
Date of Adjudication Hearing: 18/09/2019
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Niamh O'Carroll Kelly B.L.
Procedure:
In accordance with Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act, following the referral of the complaint to me by the Director General, I inquired into the complaint and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the complaint.
Summary of Complainant’s Case:
No Appearance by the complainant. However, the complainant’s Union Representative was present in relation to the two co-complainants. It was agreed that the decision in ADJ 22009 and ADJ 22011 would apply to this complainant despite him not being present. |
Summary of Respondent’s Case:
No evidence was adduced due to the complainant’s failure to attend for the hearing. |
Findings and Conclusions:
As no evidence was adduced on behalf of this complainant, I find that this matter, due to the lack of evidence, is not well founded and accordingly fails. |
Decision:
Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under Schedule 6 of that Act.
The complaint fails. However, It was agreed that the decision in ADJ 22009 and ADJ 22011 would apply to this complainant despite him not being present. |
Dated: March 24th 2020
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Niamh O'Carroll Kelly B.L.
Key Words:
|