ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION/RECOMMENDATION
Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00024604
Parties:
| Complainant | Respondent |
Anonymised Parties | Construction Worker | Construction Company |
Representatives | None | None |
Complaint:
Act | Complaint/Dispute Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 7 of the Terms of Employment (Information) Act, 1994 | CA-00031109-002 | 24/09/2019 |
Date of Adjudication Hearing: 10/12/2019
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Gene Mealy
Procedure:
In accordance with Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act, 2015 following the referral of the complaint / dispute to me by the Director General, I inquired into the complaint / dispute and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the complaint / dispute.
Background:
The claimant, nor the respondent, were present to give evidence at the hearing. I satisfied myself that both parties were properly notified of the time and date of the scheduled hearing. |
Summary of Complainant’s Case:
Complainant did not attend. |
Summary of Respondent’s Case:
Respondent did not attend. |
Findings and Conclusions:
Complaint seeking adjudication under Section 11 of Minimum Notice and Terms of Employment Act, 1973. Complaints seeking adjudication under Section 7 of the Terms of Employment (Information) Act, 1994. |
Decision:
Section 7 of the Terms of Employment (Information) Act, 1994 requires that I make a decision in relation to the claim in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under the Act
CA-00031109-002 As the Complainant was not present to give evidence in support of the complaints, this leads me to no other conclusion but to decide that the claims were not well founded and therefore fail. |
Dated: May 14th 2020
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Gene Mealy
Key Words:
Minimum Notice Terms of Employment (Information) Act, 1994 |