ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION

Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00013439

Parties:

	Complainant	Respondent
Anonymised Parties	A General Operative	A Construction Company


Representatives	Self	Did not attend

Complaint:

Act	Complaint Reference No.	Date of Receipt
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under Section 39 of the Redundancy Payments Act, 1967	CA-00017872-001	11/03/2018

Date of Adjudication Hearing: 19/10/2018

Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Pat Brady

Procedure:

In accordance with Section 39 of the Redundancy Payments Acts 1967 – 2014following the referral of the complaint(s)/dispute(s) to me by the Director General, I inquired into the complaint(s)/dispute(s) and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the complaint(s)/dispute(s).

Summary of Complainant’s Case:

The complainant stated that he had been made redundant but had not received a redundancy payment.

Summary of Respondent’s Case:

The respondent did not attend the hearing

Findings and Conclusions:

It emerged that the complaint had already been addressed in a previous adjudication and that a decision had issued in respect of the complaint.

Accordingly, this complaint is not well founded.

Decision:

Section 39 of the Redundancy Payments Acts 1967 – 2012 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under that Act.

For the reason set out above I find complaint CA-00017872 is not well founded.

Dated: 28th September 2020

Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Pat Brady

Key Words:

Redundancy Complaint previously adjudicated.