ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION
Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00032125
Parties:
| Complainant | Respondent |
Parties | Adam Mura | Phelan Gaming Phelan Gaming |
Representatives | Self |
|
Complaint:
Act | Complaint Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 6 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1991 | CA-00042846-001 | 19/02/2021 |
Date of Adjudication Hearing: 17/08/2021
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: John Harraghy
Procedure:
In accordance with Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act, 2015 following the referral of the complaint to me by the Director General, I inquired into the complaint and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the complaint.
The matter was heard by way of remote hearing pursuant to the Civil Law and Criminal Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 2020 and S.I. 359/2020, which designated the WRC as a body empowered to hold remote hearings.
The remote hearing was scheduled for 17/08/2021. The complainant and a witness attended. There was no appearance by or on behalf of the respondent.
I am satisfied that the respondent was issued with a letter by e mail on 21/06/2021 advising him of the date and time of the hearing. Having reviewed the file I note that the respondent was in contact with the WRC and the e mail address did not change. In order to exercise a significant amount of caution the WRC Concierge rang both the respondent and left messages but there was no contact from either.
Background:
This is a duplicate complaint submitted by the same complainant against the same respondent which was adjudicated upon in ADJ-00032124. |
Summary of Complainant’s Case:
This is a duplicate complaint submitted by the same complainant against the same respondent which was adjudicated upon in ADJ-00032124. |
Summary of Respondent’s Case:
This is a duplicate complaint submitted by the same complainant against the same respondent which was adjudicated upon in ADJ-00032124. |
Findings and Conclusions:
This is a duplicate complaint submitted by the same complainant against the same respondent which was adjudicated upon in ADJ-00032124. As I have already adjudicated upon this complaint, I do not have jurisdiction to hear this duplicate complaint. |
Decision:
Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under Schedule 6 of that Act.
This is a duplicate complaint submitted by the same complainant against the same respondent which was adjudicated upon in ADJ-00032124. As I have already adjudicated upon this complaint, I do not have jurisdiction to hear this duplicate complaint. |
Dated: 24th August 2021
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: John Harraghy
Key Words:
Duplicate complaint. |