FULL RECOMMENDATION
SECTION 26(1), INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS ACT, 1990 PARTIES : ARRABAWN CO-OP (REPRESENTED BY IRISH BUSINESS AND EMPLOYERS' CONFEDERATION) - AND - 14 GENERAL OPERATIVES (REPRESENTED BY SERVICES INDUSTRIAL PROFESSIONAL TECHNICAL UNION) DIVISION :
SUBJECT: 1.Terms relating to the commissioning / running of a new casein plant. This dispute could not be resolved at local level and was the subject of a Conciliation Conference under the auspices of the Workplace Relations Commission. As agreement was not reached, the dispute was referred to the Labour Court on 9 November 2020 in accordance with Section 26(1) of the Industrial Relations Act, 1990.
1. The company has always maintained that the addition of a second casein facility constitutes normal ongoing change within the business. 2. In respect of the team leader roles, the company has always stated that the long-term structural requirements of the business are under review and that there would be full consultation on any changes in respect of the casein plant operators’ role, prior to any changes in the employee structure.
This Recommendation is designed to maintain the trust and the working relationship between the parties. The Court accepts the position of the Employer that the establishment of a new plant, in itself, is not a basis for a claim for additional remuneration. Such significant investment is likely to have long term, positive consequences for both the Employer and Workers. The Court has set out previously what it considers to be normal ongoing change and in this case the Employer has paid already for this. However, given the unique circumstances that gave rise to expectations, the Court makes the following Recommendation;
2.The seven Workers who were in the employment of the company at the relevant time of July 2019 should receive a ‘once-off’ voucher of €500 as a gesture of good-will. 3.Workers taken on by the company since that date to work on the new plant should receive a ‘once off’ voucher of €250 as a gesture of good-will. 4.The parties should engage in ongoing dialogue regarding the staffing requirements of the new plant, having regard to the aspirations of the workers to generate career opportunities and to the company’s ultimate right to determine its staffing needs. In this regard, the Court notes that the Employer advised of an open mind regarding staffing requirements in the area concerned. If there are still issues between the parties at the end of 2021, they should avail of the assistance of the Workplace Relations Commission to seek to achieve a resolution that reflects both the rights of the Employer and the legitimate career aspirations of the Workers. This Recommendation arises in the unique circumstances of the instant case. Because of that uniqueness, by definition, it cannot constitute a precedent for any future case. The Court so recommends.
NOTE Enquiries concerning this Recommendation should be addressed to Ciaran Roche, Court Secretary. |