ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION
Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00034415
Parties:
| Complainant | Respondent |
Parties | Martin Schranz | HSE |
Representatives | Self Represented | Comyn Kelleher Tobin Solicitors |
Complaint:
Act | Complaint/Dispute Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 6 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1991 | CA-00045508-001 | 03/08/2021 |
Date of Adjudication Hearing: June 9th 2022
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Peter O'Brien
Procedure:
In accordance with Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act, 2015 following the referral of the complaint to me by the Director General, I inquired into the complaint and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the complaint. This matter was heard by way of remote hearing pursuant to the Civil Law and Criminal Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 2020 and SI 359/20206, which designates the WRC as a body empowered to hold remote hearings. In deference to the Supreme Court ruling, Zalewski v Ireland and the WRC [2021] IESC 24 on the 6th of April 2021 the Parties were informed in advance that the Hearing would be in Public, Testimony under Oath or Affirmation would be required and full cross examination of all witnesses would be provided for. The Hearing too place completely in public and the required Affirmation / Oath was administered to all witnesses. The legal perils of committing Perjury were explained to all parties. Full cross examination of Witnesses was allowed. Post Hearing correspondence took place.
Background:
The Complainant alleged he was not paid for hours worked. |
Summary of Complainant’s Case:
The Complainant alleged he was not paid for work done in 2020 and the payment was due on January 31st 2021. |
Summary of Respondent’s Case:
The Respondent denied any wages were properly payable as the Complainant had received all the payments due under his contract of employment or conditions of employment. The Respondent has demonstrated compliance with the provisions of the Payment of Wages Act 1991. In so far as the Complainant seeks to suggest that he should be paid a sum over and above the annual limit applicable to him for C Factor payments under his Contract and in accordance with the Terms of Settlement availed of by the Complainant, the Respondent urged the Adjudication Officer to:- (a) decline to uphold the complaints on the basis it has no jurisdiction to determine the complaints; or in the alternative, (b) decline to uphold the complains on the merits. By way of preliminary objection, the Respondent submitted that pursuant to Section 41(6) of the Workplace Relations Act, 2015, the WRC did not have jurisdiction to entertain the Complaint. Section 41(6) provides that, in the absence of reasonable cause for the delay, a complaint which is submitted more than six months from the date of the contravention to which the complaint relates cannot be entertained by an adjudication officer. Complaint CA-00045508-001 concerns overtime completed in 2020, which the Complainant alleges should have been paid on 31st January 2021, which is also more than six months previous to the date on which the complaint was lodged, being the 3rd August 2021. |
Findings and Conclusions:
The Law Section 41(6) and (8) of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 (‘the 2015 Act’) provides as follows:- · 41(6) Subject to subsection (8), an adjudication officer shall not entertain a complaint referred to him or her under this section if it has been presented to the Director General after the expiration of the period of 6 months beginning on the date of the contravention to which the complaint relates. 41(8) An adjudication officer may entertain a complaint or dispute to which this section applies presented or referred to the Director General after the expiration of the period referred to in subsection (6) or (7) (but not later than 6 months after such expiration), as the case may be, if he or she is satisfied that the failure to present the complaint or refer the dispute within that period was due to reasonable cause. The within claim was presented to the Workplace Relations Commission on August 3rd 2021. No application was made for an extension of time. As the Complainant stated the payment was due on January 31st 2021, the claim was presented out of time and is consequently statue barred. |
Decision:
Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint(s)/dispute(s) in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under Schedule 6 of that Act.
I find the complaint is statue barred. |
Dated: August 25th 2022
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Peter O'Brien
Key Words: