ADJUDICATION OFFICER RECOMMENDATION
Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00032846
Parties:
| Complainant | Respondent |
Anonymised Parties | A General Operative | A Food Producer |
Representatives |
| Judy McNamara |
Complaint(s):
Act | Complaint/Dispute Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under the Industrial Relations Acts | 09/04/2021 |
Date of Adjudication Hearing: 04/05/2022
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Roger McGrath
Procedure:
In accordance with Section 13 of the Industrial Relations Acts 1969 following the referral of the dispute to me by the Director General, I inquired into the dispute and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the dispute.
Background:
The Complainant did not attend the hearing and offered no explanation for failing to do so. |
Summary of Complainant’s Case:
|
Summary of Respondent’s Case:
|
Findings and Conclusions:
The Complainant did not attend the hearings convened to hear direct evidence in support of his claim. The Employment Appeals Tribunal in Case No. UD1112/08 Kozlowski v Multi Roofings Systems Ltd. found: "The legal requirements place an onus on a Claimant to prosecute his case and to be present for the hearing." The Complainant in this instant case did not attend the hearing. |
Decision:
Section 13 of the Industrial Relations Acts, 1969 requires that I make a recommendation in relation to the dispute.
I make no recommendation. |
Dated: 6th July 2022
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Roger McGrath
Key Words:
No Show |