ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION
Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00035647
Parties:
| Complainant | Respondent |
Parties | Dorian-Laur Niculita | Brightglen Ltd Ely Bar and Grill |
Complaint:
Act | Complaint Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under Section 39 of the Redundancy Payments Act, 1967 | CA-00046759-001 | 20/10/2021 |
Date of Adjudication Hearing: 15/06/2022
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Pat Brady
Procedure:
In accordance with Section 39 of the Redundancy Payments Acts 1967 - 2014 following the referral of the complaint to me by the Director General, I inquired into the complaint and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the complaint.
Summary of Complainant’s Case:
The complainant did not attend the hearing. |
Summary of Respondent’s Case:
The respondent did not attend the hearing. |
Findings and Conclusions:
A complaint was received by the Director General of the Workplace Relations Commission by the complainant alleging breaches of the above statute and was referred to me for investigation. There was no appearance by or on behalf of the complainant at the hearing. I am satisfied that the complainant was sent notice in writing to the address provided on the complaint form of the date, time and place at which the hearing to investigate the complaint would be held. In these circumstances and in the absence of any evidence to the contrary having been adduced before me, I must conclude that the within complaint is not well-founded and I decide accordingly. |
Decision:
Section 39 of the Redundancy Payments Acts 1967 – 2012 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under that Act.
For the reason set out above I find Complaint CA-00046579-001 not to be well founded. |
Dated: 01/07/2022
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Pat Brady
Key Words:
No show by complainant. |