ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION.
Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00035763
Parties:
| Complainant | Respondent |
Parties | Tomasz Perkowski | Oic Cleaning |
Representatives | In person | Company manager |
Complaint(s):
Act | Complaint/Dispute Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 7 of the Terms of Employment (Information) Act, 1994 | CA-00046934-001 | 02/11/2021 |
Date of Adjudication Hearing: 27/06/2022
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Jim Dolan
Procedure:
In accordance with Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act, 2015 following the referral of the complaint to me by the Director General, I inquired into the complaint and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the complaint.
Background:
The Complainant commenced employment with the Respondent on 26th July 2021 and left this employment on 25th August 2021, he was employed as a Human Resources Manager. This complaint was received by the Workplace Relations Commission on 2nd November 2021. |
Summary of Complainant’s Case:
The Complainant commenced employment with the Respondent on 26th July 2021 and left this employment on 25th August 2021, he was employed as a Human Resources Manager. The Complainant contends that pursuant to the Employment (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 2018 the employer is legally obligated to provide the employee, no later than 5 days after the commencement of employment a written statement containing 5 main terms and conditions of employment: 1. The full names of the employer and the employee 2. The address of the employer 3. Duration of contract 4. The rate of pay, method of calculation and the pay reference period 5. The number of hours to be worked each week. The Respondent failed to provide such a statement. |
Summary of Respondent’s Case:
The Respondent understands that the purpose of issuing the 5 core terms of employment in writing within 5 days is so that the employee would understand his/her core terms of employment. In this instance the Respondent would assert that through the negotiations via email on 19th and 20th July 2021 the Complainant did actually receive these in writing via email, he was fully aware of the 5 core terms of employment and more importantly understood these 5 core terms. The Respondent asserts that it did fulfil its obligations in relation to the Terms of Employment (Information) Act, 1994. |
Findings and Conclusions:
I believe the Complainant was fully aware of the five core terms of employment and the email exchanges prior to the commencement of employment would suggest this was the case. Technically, the Complainant should have been issued with this statement in writing. Section 7 (e) of the Terms of Employment (Information) Act, 1994 (as amended) reads as follows: (e) in relation to a complaint of a contravention under section 6C, and without prejudice to any order made under paragraph (d), order the employer to pay to the employee compensation of such amount (if any) as the adjudication officer considers just and equitable having regard to all of the circumstances but not exceeding 4 weeks’ remuneration in respect of the employee’s employment calculated in accordance with regulations under section 17 of the Unfair Dismissals Act 1977. I now order the Respondent to pay compensation to the Complainant in the sum of one week’s wages i.e. €1,057.69. This payment should be paid to the Complainant within 42 days from the date of this decision. |
Decision:
Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under Schedule 6 of that Act.
I now order the Respondent to pay compensation to the Complainant in the sum of one week’s wages i.e. €1,057.69. This payment should be paid to the Complainant within 42 days from the date of this decision. |
Dated: 14th July 2022
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Jim Dolan
Key Words:
|