ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION/RECOMMENDATION
Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00021989
Parties:
| Complainant | Respondent |
Parties | Mauro Salviato | Gentile Bellini Limited |
Representatives | The claimant did not attend and was not represented at the hearing | John Anderson McGovern Walsh Solicitors |
Complaint(s):
Act | Complaint/Dispute Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 6 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1991 | CA-00028965-001 | 05/06/2019 |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 7 of the Terms of Employment (Information) Act, 1994 | CA-00028965-002 | 05/06/2019 |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under Section 8 of the Unfair Dismissals Act, 1977 | CA-00028965-003 | 05/06/2019 |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under Section 12 of the Minimum Notice & Terms of Employment Act, 1973 | CA-00028965-004 | 05/06/2019 |
Date of Adjudication Hearing: 18/07/2022
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Emer O'Shea
Procedure:
In accordance with Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act, 2015 and/or Section 8 of the Unfair Dismissals Acts, 1977 - 2015, and/or Section 6 of the Payment of Wages Act , 1991 and/or Section 7 of the Terms of Employment (Information) Act 1994 and/or Section 12 of the Minimum Notice and Terms of Employment Act , 1973 following the referral of the complaint(s)/dispute(s) to me by the Director General, I inquired into the complaint(s)/dispute(s) and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the complaint(s)/dispute(s).
Decision:
Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint(s)/dispute(s) in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under Schedule 6 of that Act.
Section 6 of the Payment of Wages Act 1991 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under that Act. requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under that Act.
The claimant did not attend and was not represented at the hearing .
I am satisfied that the claimant was duly notified of the date time and place at which the hearing to investigate the complaint would be held. The claimant did not attend and no application for a postponement was submitted in the weeks preceding the hearing. In these circumstances and in the absence of any evidence to the contrary having been adduced before me, I must conclude that the within complaint is not well founded and I decide accordingly.
Section 7 of the Terms of Employment (Information)Act 1994 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under that Act.
The claimant did not attend and was not represented at the hearing .
I am satisfied that the claimant was duly notified of the date time and place at which the hearing to investigate the complaint would be held. The claimant did not attend and no application for a postponement was submitted in the weeks preceding the hearing. In these circumstances and in the absence of any evidence to the contrary having been adduced before me, I must conclude that the within complaint is not well founded and I decide accordingly.
Section 12 of the Minimum Notice and Terms of requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under that Act.
The claimant did not attend and was not represented at the hearing .
I am satisfied that the claimant was duly notified of the date time and place at which the hearing to investigate the complaint would be held. The claimant did not attend and no application for a postponement was submitted in the weeks preceding the hearing. In these circumstances and in the absence of any evidence to the contrary having been adduced before me, I must conclude that the within complaint is not well founded and I decide accordingly.
Section 8 of the Unfair Dismissals Acts, 1977 – 2015 requires that I make a decision in relation to the unfair dismissal claim consisting of a grant of redress in accordance with section 7 of the 1977 Act.
The claimant did not attend and was not represented at the hearing .
I am satisfied that the claimant was duly notified of the date time and place at which the hearing to investigate the complaint would be held. The claimant did not attend and no application for a postponement was submitted in the weeks preceding the hearing. In these circumstances and in the absence of any evidence to the contrary having been adduced before me, I must conclude that the within complaint is not well founded and I decide accordingly.
Dated: 15th November 2022.
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Emer O'Shea
Key Words:
|