ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION
Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00036493
Parties:
| Complainant | Respondent |
Parties | Pavels Konosonoks | Health Service Executive |
Representatives |
|
|
Complaint(s):
Act | Complaint/Dispute Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under Section 21 Equal Status Act, 2000 | CA-00046012-002 | 03/08/2021 |
Date of Adjudication Hearing: 18/10/2022
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Hugh Lonsdale
Procedure:
In accordance with Section 25 of the Equal Status Act, 2000, following the referral of the complaint to me by the Director General, I inquired into the complaint and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the complaint.
Background:
A hearing of this complaint was scheduled for 18 October 2022 and both parties were informed of this by letter sent 8 September 2022. Neither the complainant nor the respondent attended the hearing. No communication was given by the complainant for his non-attendance. |
Summary of Complainant’s Case:
Did not attend |
Summary of Respondent’s Case:
Did not attend |
Findings and Conclusions:
The complaint was referred for investigation and a hearing for that purpose took place on 18 October 2022. The complainant was not present but I am satisfied he was informed of the hearing. As he did not attend the hearing the complainant was unable to give direct evidence to pursue his complaint. In the absence of direct evidence I conclude the complaint is not well founded. |
Decision:
Section 25 of the Equal Status Acts, 2000 – 2015 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under section 27 of that Act.
For the reasons given above I find the complaint is not well founded. |
Dated: 23/11/2022
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Hugh Lonsdale
Key Words:
Complainant did not attend |