FULL RECOMMENDATION
SECTION 13(9), INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS ACT, 1969 PARTIES : HEALTH SERVICE EXECUTIVE (REPRESENTED BY HEALTH SERVICE EXECUTIVE) - AND - A WORKER (REPRESENTED BY SERVICES INDUSTRIAL PROFESSIONAL TECHNICAL UNION) DIVISION :
SUBJECT: 1.Appeal of Adjudication Officer Decision No(s) ADJ-00025129 CA-00031703-001. Summary of Employer arguments.
DECISION: On the basis of the submissions made, the Court is satisfied that the Worker was treated, when assigned to act on higher duties, in accordance with the agreed arrangements that were applicable at the time and that the subsequent calculation of his pay, upon his regularisation in the higher grade, was carried out in accordance with HSE Circular 0017/2013. However, the Court cannot avoid noting that it took until end 2021 before the Employer was in a position to confirm that this was the case and that, in the interim, both the Worker and the Adjudication Officer were misled into believing that arrears of €61,726 were accepted by the Employer as owing to the Worker. This is not just extraordinary, it is extremely unfair to the Worker. It created an understandable expectation on his part. The Court is mindful not to issue any Recommendation that could lead to follow on claims by other people who were treated equally in accordance with the agreed arrangements. However, the Court also has to be mindful of the invidious position in which the Worker has been placed due to the inability of the Employer to readily identify the correct application of its own procedures. Accordingly, the Court believes that compensation in the amount of €10,000 should be paid by the Employer to the Worker and the Court so recommends.
NOTE Enquiries concerning this Decision should be addressed to Therese Hickey, Court Secretary. |