ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION

Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00035151

Parties:

	Complainant	Respondent
Parties	Elizabete Zamozdika	Explore Marketing Limited t/a Trespass

Complaints:

Act	Complaint Reference No.	Date of Receipt
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 7 of the Terms of Employment (Information) Act, 1994	CA-00046299-001	18/09/2021
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 7 of the Terms of Employment (Information) Act, 1994	CA-00046299-002	18/09/2021

Date of Adjudication Hearing: 06/09/2022

Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Pat Brady

Procedure:

In accordance with Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act, 2015 following the referral of the complaints to me by the Director General, I inquired into the complaints and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the complaints.

Summary of Complainant’s Case:

The complainant did not attend the hearing.

Summary of Respondent’s Case:

The respondent representative was in attendance.

Findings and Conclusions:

A complaint was received by the Director General of the Workplace Relations Commission by the complainant alleging breaches of the above statutes.

The said complaint was referred to me for investigation.

There was no appearance by or on behalf of the complainant at the hearing.

I am satisfied that the said complainant was sent notice in writing to the address provided on the complaint form of the date, time and place at which the hearing to investigate the complaint would be held. She had engaged with the WRC on a number of occasions, and I am satisfied that she was fully aware of the arrangements for the earing

In these circumstances and in the absence of any evidence to the contrary having been adduced before me, I must conclude that the within complaint is not well-founded and I decide accordingly.

Decision:

Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaints in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under Schedule 6 of that Act.

For the reason set out above Complaints CA-00046299-001 and 002 are not well-founded.

Dated: 22nd September 2022.

Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Pat Brady

Key Words:

‘No Show’ by complainant.