ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION/RECOMMENDATION
Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00038137
Parties:
| Complainant | Respondent |
Parties | Jamie McDonald | Brown Sugar Brown Sugar |
Representatives | Did Not Attend | Did Not Attend |
Complaint:
Act | Complaint/Dispute Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 7 of the Terms of Employment (Information) Act, 1994 | CA-00049555-001 | 07/04/2022 |
Date of Adjudication Hearing: 12/12/2022
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Michael MacNamee
Procedure:
In accordance with Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act, 2015following the referral of the complaint(s)/dispute(s) to me by the Director General, I inquired into the complaint(s)/dispute(s) and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the complaint(s)/dispute(s).
Background:
Neither party attended the adjudication hearing convened for the 12th of December 2022.
|
Summary of Complainant’s Case:
The Complainant did not attend. |
Summary of Respondent’s Case:
The Respondent did not attend. |
Findings and Conclusions:
On the basis that there was no appearance on behalf of the Complainant, the Respondent had no case to answer. Therefore, the complaint is not well-founded. |
Decision:
Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under Schedule 6 of that Act.
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 7 of the Terms of Employment (Information) Act, 1994 CA-00049555-001 – The Complaint is not well-founded |
Dated: 10th February 2023.
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Michael MacNamee
Key Words:
Terms of Employment (Information) Act 1994 - Non-attendance |