ADJUDICATION OFFICER Recommendation on dispute under Industrial Relations Act 1969
Investigation Recommendation Reference: ADJ 44786
Parties:
| Worker | Employer |
Anonymised Parties | A Receptionist | A Veterinary Practice |
Representatives | Catherine Bourke Adrian P Bourke Solicitors | In Person on 15.11.22 No Appearance on 20.3.23. |
Dispute(s):
Act | Dispute Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Industrial Relations Act 1969 | CA - 00049855 | 29.3.22 |
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Emile Daly
Date of Hearing:
Procedure:
In accordance with Section 13 of the Industrial Relations Act 1969 (as amended)following the referral of the dispute to me by the Director General, I inquired into the dispute and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any information relevant to the dispute.
Background:
The Complainant worked for a Vet Practice and claims that she was dismissed. This complaint is an unfair dismissal complaint pursuant to the Industrial Relations Acts 1969 as amended. |
Summary of Workers Case:
The Complainant withdrew this IR complaint at the Adjudication hearing on 20 March 2023 |
Summary of Employer’s Case:
No appearance |
Conclusions:
The Complainant withdrew this complaint at the Adjudication hearing on 20 March 2023 preferring instead to pursue a number of employment rights complaints, which were adjudicated upon and decided.
|
Recommendation:
Section 13 of the Industrial Relations Act 1969 requires that I make a recommendation in relation to the dispute.
As this complaint was withdrawn at hearing I make no recommendation in relation to the dispute.
Dated: 31-May-2023
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Emile Daly
Key Words:
|