ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION

Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00044789

Parties:

	Complainant	Respondent
Parties	Lucian Liviu Ionut	Vladimir Vecerin Pepito Trade

	Complainant	Respondent
Parties	Lucian Liviu Ionut	Vladimir Vecerin Pepito Trade

Representatives

Marius Marosan /No Show by Representative or Complainant

Vladimir Vecerin

Complaint(s):

Act	Complaint Reference No.	Date of Receipt
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 7 of the Terms of Employment (Information) Act, 1994	CA-00055617-001	21/03/2023
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 7 of the Terms of Employment (Information) Act, 1994	CA-00055617-002	21/03/2023
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under Section 23 of the Industrial Relations (Amendment) Act, 2015	CA-00055617-003	21/03/2023
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under Section 23 of the Industrial Relations (Amendment) Act, 2015	CA-00055617-004	21/03/2023
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 27 of the Organisation of Working Time Act, 1997	CA-00055617-006	21/03/2023
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 27 of the Organisation of Working Time Act, 1997	CA-00055617-007	21/03/2023
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 6 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1991	CA-00055617-008	21/03/2023
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under Section 12 of the Minimum Notice & Terms of Employment Act, 1973	CA-00055617-010	21/03/2023

Date of Adjudication Hearing: 09/08/2023

Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Brian Dalton

Procedure:

In accordance with Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act, 2015 following the referral of the complaint(s) to me by the Director General, I inquired into the complaint(s) and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the complaint(s).

Background:

The Complainant was employed with the Respondent as a labourer.

He commenced his employment on or about the 3rd of October 2022 and his employment ended on or about the 9th of March 2023.

Summary of Complainant’s Case:

The Complainant failed to attend to make out his case.

Summary of Respondent’s Case:

The Respondent was in attendance and ready to rebut the allegations made against him.

Findings and Conclusions:

I am satisfied that the Complainant was notified of the time, date and place of the hearing and failed to attend. In these circumstances where the Respondent was in attendance, I must dismiss all the complaints made against him for want of prosecution as the Complainant failed to attend at the hearing to present his case.

Decision:

Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint(s) in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under Schedule 6 of that Act.

CA-00055617-001 Terms and Conditions of Employment: