FULL RECOMMENDATION
SECTION 20(1), INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS ACT, 1969 PARTIES: MOORE CLEANING SERVICES LTD - AND - A WORKER DIVISION:
SUBJECT: 1.Complaint Under Section 20(1) Of The Industrial Relation Act 1969 RECOMMENDATION: This matter was referred to the Court pursuant to section 20(1) of the Industrial Relations Act 1969 (‘the Act’). Subject Matter of the Dispute The Worker submitted that she was treated unfairly in a number of respects when employed by her former employer, Moore Cleaning Services Limited (‘the Company’), as a cleaner at one of its client sites. She told the Court that she raised a grievance in relation to the alleged unfair treatment utilising the mechanisms provided for in the Company’s grievance policy. It is common case that a grievance meeting took place at the Company’s offices on 7 March 2023 and that the Worker - although on notice that she was entitled to be accompanied at that meeting – attended alone. Two management representatives were present. Management’s position is that it had initiated an investigation into the various complaints that the Worker had set out in an email to them on 18 January 2023 and that it had interviewed the work colleagues named by the Worker in her complaint following receipt of the Worker’s email. The principal of the company told the Court that a letter issued to the Worker after the grievance meeting advising her that her complainants had not been upheld as they did not constitute a work-related grievance but were considered to be in the nature of a personal dispute with the Worker’s former supervisor and neighbour. The Worker was unhappy with the outcome of the grievance process and referred a dispute to the Workplace Relations Commission on 16 March 2023 under section 13 of the Act but the Company opted not to participate in that process. Discussion and Recommendation Having considered the Parties’ written and oral submissions, the Court is satisfied that the Company applied its own procedures correctly and afforded the Worker a reasonable and fair opportunity to air the issues of concern to her. That being the case, the Court does not recommend any further steps be taken by the Company in relation the matter that is the subject of the within referral. The Court so recommends.
NOTE Enquiries concerning this Recommendation should be addressed to Sinead O'Connor, Court Secretary. |