ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION
Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00026962
Parties:
| Complainant | Respondent |
Parties | Daniel O’Connell | Metropolitan Films International Limited |
Representatives | Liz Murray, Irish Film Workers Association | Ciarán Loughran, Irish Business and Employers’ Confederation |
Complaints:
Act | Complaint Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 6 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1991 | CA-00033705-001 | 10/01/2020 |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 27 of the Organisation of Working Time Act, 1997 | CA-00033705-002 Withdrawn | 10/01/2020 |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 7 of the Terms of Employment (Information) Act, 1994 | CA-00033705-003 | 10/01/2020 |
Date of Adjudication Hearing: 06/03/2023
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Catherine Byrne
Procedure:
Mr O’Connell is a member of the Irish Film Workers’ Association (IFWA) and is represented by Ms Liz Murray. Metropolitan Films was represented at this hearing by Ms Ciarán Loughran of IBEC.
Between December 2019 and October 2021, Mr O’Connell and 38 colleagues in IFWA submitted complaints to the WRC under various employment law statutes. In December 2021, a small sample of complaints were heard and decisions on this sample group of complaints were issued in April 2022. Hearings were then scheduled for the remaining complaints between December 2022 and June 2023.
This is a decision concerning Mr O’Connell’s complaints under the Terms of Employment (Information) Act 1994 and the Payment of Wages Act 1991. The complaint under the Organisation of Working Time Act 1997 was withdrawn. At a hearing at the WRC on March 6th 2023, I made enquiries and gave both sides an opportunity to be heard and to present evidence relevant to the complaints. Mr O’Connell was the only witness for his case. Ms Gillian Coffey, the office manager at Metropolitan Films International Limited, attended the hearing, but she did not give evidence.
Background:
Mr O’Connell is a carpenter and he worked in the construction department on films and television programmes developed by an employer who he refers to as “Metropolitan Films” with an address at Ardmore Studios, Bray, County Wicklow. He said that he worked for the company and subsidiary companies since 2000, when he started on “The Count of Monte Christo.” At the hearing, he said that he normally worked around 54 hours a week. His hourly rate of pay was €25.12. He and his colleagues were employed for the duration that a film was in production, and then they stopped working and waited for a new film to start. Mr O’Connell said that when he finished working on “Into the Badlands” on September 22nd 2017, he went to work with a different company, “TRS” on the production of a film called “The Rhythm Section.” On behalf of the respondent, Mr Loughran argued that TRS is a different company, and, since Mr O’Connell last worked on Badlands 3 in September 2017, his complaint is outside the maximum statutory time limit of 12 months within which a complaint can be adjudicated on at the WRC. Before proceeding any further with Mr O’Connell’s complaints, I intend to deal with the issue of the time limit. While the parties are named in this decision, for the remainder of this document, I will refer to Mr O’Connell as “the complainant,” and to Metropolitan Films as “the respondent.” |
Preliminary Issue: Time Limit for Submitting a Complaint:
Mr Loughran said that the complainant was last engaged with Badlands Three TV Productions DAC, a company that shares a director with the respondent, and that his employment with that company ended on September 22nd 2017. As these complaints were lodged with the WRC on January 10th 2020, well over 12 months since the complainant last worked with Badlands Three, they have been submitted outside the time limit of six months which is set out at s.41(6) and the time lime of 12 months which is set out at s.41(8) of the Workplace Relations Act 2015. Mr Loughran submitted that, as the complaints were submitted well outside these time limits, I have no jurisdiction to hear them. For the complainant, Ms Murray submitted that there is a provision in a 1991 agreement with respondent, that workers may move to another employer if the company they are working with lays them off. She said that this 1991 agreement was the basis for a further agreement in 2012, when Mr Morgan O’Sullivan sought a local deal with the unions representing construction workers. In his evidence at the hearing, the complainant said that he worked on a sequence of films with the respondent, including nine months on “King Arthur,” and he understood that he could be laid off and called back at any moment. He said that contracts were normally issued when a job finished, and then he was paid holiday pay. He said that he kept himself available for film work. Four or five weeks after he finished on the third season of Badlands in September 2017, he said that he made enquiries about more work, but he “got the run around.” He said that he applied for a job with the respondent in 2018, although he couldn’t remember the name of the film being produced. He said that one of the construction managers on that film told him that he wouldn’t be re-employed. |
Findings on the Issue of the Time Limit
I have considered the complainant’s arguments, and, it is apparent that he worked on Badlands 3 until September 22nd 2017 and that, following a period of lay-off, he got work with a separate employer, TRS, on the production of “The Rhythm Section.” We know from the union’s submission that, from early in 2018, relations between the respondent and IFWA became strained following the appearance of the shop steward, John Arkins at the Oireachtas Committee on Media, Tourism, Arts, Culture, Sports and the Gaeltacht. Correspondence submitted by IFWA revealed that, in September 2018, notice of industrial action was issued to the employer on the production of the “Vikings” series and it appears that there was a brief work stoppage. From that point on, it seems that, when they finished up on their current assignments, the respondent did not call IFWA members back to work. Unlike his colleagues who have brought similar complaints to the WRC, the complainant was working with a different employer from shortly after September 2017. I understand that Season 3 of “Into the Badlands” finished in August 2018 and season 6 of “Vikings” finished in December that year, so it is likely that work was available for a stagehand / carpenter. The complainant may not have been available to work on these productions, or, he may not have been called in. If he wasn’t called in during 2018, he did not raise a grievance. As he submitted these complaints to the WRC on January 10th 2020, they are considerably outside the statutory time limit and I must conclude that I have no jurisdiction to proceed with my enquiry. |
Decision:
Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaints in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under Schedule 6 of that Act.
I have concluded that these complaints were submitted to the WRC more than 15 months after the expiry of the 12-month extended time limit within which a complaint must be presented for adjudication. I decide therefore, that I have no jurisdiction to adjudicate on the complaints. |
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Catherine Byrne
Date: 15-12-2023
Key Words:
Expiry of the time limit for submitting a complaint |