ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION
Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00038472
Parties:
| Complainant | Respondent |
Parties | Zhivka Zhelyazkova | Xs Direct Insurance Brokers Limited |
Representatives | self | No Show |
Complaint(s):
Act | Complaint Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 6 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1991 | CA-00049685-001 | 13/04/2022 |
Date of Adjudication Hearing: 29/11/2022
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Brian Dalton
Procedure:
In accordance with Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act, following the referral of the complaint to me by the Director General, I inquired into the complaint and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the complaint.
Background:
The Complainant commenced employment with the Respondent on or about the 20th of August 2007. She held senior roles with the company. The Respondent employer is in receivership.
Arising from financial challenges the company implemented pay cuts on or about 23rd of April 2020. The cut amounted to a 15% reduction and initially it was to last for 6 months. The Complainant stated that the cut was implemented unilaterally. On or about the 15th of April 2020 the CEO had informed employees that their agreement was required before implementing any pay cut.
Due to ongoing financial challenges the CEO wrote to staff on or about 30th of July 2020, to inform staff that pay cuts would last for a further 6 months. The Complainant stated that she never agreed to this reduction.
On the 16th of February 2022 the Complainant was made redundant.
The Complainant amended her form at the hearing and stated that her complaint is for the period 6 months up to the date of lodging her complaint form with the WRC on the 13th of April 2022.
The time runs from 14th of October 2021 to 13th of April 2022 and the breach occurred from the 14th of October 2021 to the 16th of February 2022 the date she was made redundant subject to notice.
|
Summary of Complainant’s Case:
The period of loss is the 14th of October to 2021 to 16th of February 2022 a period of 126 days. The wage reduction is 15% of €90,000=€13500 divided by 365= €36.99 per day x 126= €4660.74 |
Summary of Respondent’s Case:
The Respondent was properly notified of the date and time of the hearing and failed to attend. |
Findings and Conclusions:
The Complainant has opened payslips and corroborating evidence detailing the cuts and when they would be implemented. In an email to staff dated 30th of July 2020 the CEO stated that the pay cuts previously implemented would continue for a further 6 months. The cuts on the evidence were not agreed to and continued until the Complainant’s employment ceased in February 2022. Wages in the Payment of Wages Act 1991 is defined as: “wages”, in relation to an employee, means any sums payable to the employee by the employer in connection with his employment, including— (a) any fee, bonus or commission, or any holiday, sickor maternity pay, or any other emolument, referable to his employment, whether payable under his contract of employment or otherwise, and The key issue before me is whether the amount being claimed was due. Section 5 of the Act states: 5.— (1) An employer shall not make a deduction from the wages of an employee (or receive any payment from an employee) unless— Section 5 (6) states: (6) Where— (a) the total amount of any wages that are paid on any occasion by an employer to an employee is less than the total amount of wages that is properly payable by him to the employee on that occasion (after making any deductions therefrom that fall to be made and are in accordance with this Act), or (b) none of the wages that are properly payable to an employee by an employer on any occasion (after making any such deductions as aforesaid) are paid to the employee, then, except in so far as the deficiency or non-payment is attributable to an error of computation, the amount of the deficiency or non-payment shall be treated as a deduction made by the employer from the wages of the employee on the occasion. On the evidence the reduction was made unilaterally and the total amount of wages properly payable to the Complainant was less than contractually due. I determine that for the relevant period the amount unlawfully deduced was €4660.74. |
Decision:
Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under Schedule 6 of that Act.
The Complaint is well founded. The period of loss is the 14th of October to 2021 to the 16th of February 2022 a period of 126 days. The wage reduction is 15% of €90,000=€13500 divided by 365= €36.99 per day x 126= €4660.74. Section 6 of the Act states: 6. (1) A decision of an adjudication officer under section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act 2015, in relation to a complaint of a contravention of section 5 as respects a deduction made by an employer from the wages of an employee or the receipt from an employee by an employer of a payment, that the complaint is, in whole or in part, well founded as respects the deduction or payment shall include a direction to the employer to pay to the employee compensation of such amount (if any) as he considers reasonable in the circumstances not exceeding I direct that the Respondent pay to the employee €4660.74 less any statutory deductions. |
Dated: 4th January 2023
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Brian Dalton
Key Words:
Pay Cut |