ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION
Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00040479
Parties:
| Complainant | Respondent |
Parties | María Valenzuela | Red Cherry Cafe |
Representatives |
|
|
Complaint(s):
Act | Complaint/Dispute Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 6 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1991 | CA-00051772-001 | 20/07/2022 |
Date of Adjudication Hearing: 14/07/2023
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Hugh Lonsdale
Procedure:
In accordance with Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act, 2015 following the referral of the complaint to me by the Director General, I inquired into the complaint and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the complaint.
Background:
A hearing of this complaint was scheduled for 14 July 2023 and both parties were informed by letter dated 31 May 2023. Neither the complainant of the respondent attended the hearing. No communication was received from the complainant for her non-attendance. |
Summary of Complainant’s Case:
Did not attend |
Summary of Respondent’s Case:
Did not attend |
Findings and Conclusions:
The complaint was referred to me for investigation and a hearing for that purpose took place on 14 July 2023. The complainant did not attend and I am satisfied she was informed of the hearing. As she did not attend the hearing the complainant was unable to give direct evidence to pursue her complaint. In the absence of direct evidence I conclude the complaint is not well founded. |
Decision:
Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under Schedule 6 of that Act.
For the reasons given above I find the complaint is not well founded. |
Dated: 21-July-2023
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Hugh Lonsdale
Key Words:
Complainant did not attend |