ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION
Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00044365
Parties:
| Complainant | Respondent |
Parties | Daniel Lee | Sampar Limited |
Representatives | Garrett J. Fortune & Co Solicitors |
|
Complaint(s):
Act | Complaint/Dispute Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 6 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1991 | CA-00053051-001 | 30/09/2022 |
Date of Adjudication Hearing: 13/04/2023
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Breiffni O'Neill
Procedure:
In accordance with Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act, 2015 following the referral of the complaint to me by the Director General, I inquired into the complaint and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the complaint.
Specifically, I conducted a remote hearing in accordance with the Civil Law and Criminal Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 2020 and Statutory Instrument 359/2020 which designates the Workplace Relations Commission as a body empowered to hold remote hearings.
The Complainant was in attendance on the day of the hearing along with his representative. Prior to the hearing taking place, the below email was received from the Respondent on the morning of 13 April 2022.
Dear All
As Contracts Manager for Sampar Ltd I was unable to attend the hearing today
I’ve been out of work for past 3 weeks with Medical Concerns
Any Ruling made today will be Appealed immediately
By My Client
Regards
Eamon
As a postponement was not sought either at the hearing or in advance by the Respondent, I proceeded to hear the matter.
Background:
The Complainant was employed by the Respondent as a general construction operative from 15 February 2022 and was due to be paid €650 per week net. He stated that there was a shortfall of €1,095 in respect of the wage payments that were due to him. |
Summary of Complainant’s Case:
The Complainant was employed by the Respondent as a general construction operative from 15 February 2022. At the commencement of his employment, it was verbally agreed with the Respondent that he would be paid €650 per week net. Despite this verbal agreement, he stated that wage payments were made to him on an irregular basis and there was a total shortfall of €1,095 in respect of the payments that were due to him. The Complainant stated that he stopped working on 29 March 2022 in the expectation that the monies owed would be paid to him by 1 April 2022, which was the end of that week. Despite having contacted the Respondent seeking the outstanding amounts owed, he did not receive the payments and the Complainant did not return his employment. |
Summary of Respondent’s Case:
The Respondent did not attend the hearing to give evidence. |
Findings and Conclusions:
The Law The Payment of Wages Act 1991 states at section 5 and 6 as follows: 5.— (1) An employer shall not make a deduction from the wages of an employee (or receive any payment from an employee) unless— ( a) the deduction (or payment) is required or authorised to be made by virtue of any statute or any instrument made under statute, ( b) the deduction (or payment) is required or authorised to be made by virtue of a term of the employee's contract of employment included in the contract before, and in force at the time of, the deduction or payment, or ( c) in the case of a deduction, the employee has given his prior consent in writing to it. (2) An employer shall not make a deduction from the wages of an employee in respect of— ( a) any act or omission of the employee, or ( b) any goods or services supplied to or provided for the employee by the employer the supply or provision of which is necessary to the employment, unless— iv) in case the deduction is in respect of an act or omission of the employee, the employee has been furnished, at least one week before the making of the deduction, with particulars in writing of the act or omission and the amount of the deduction, (6) Where— (a) the total amount of any wages that are paid on any occasion by an employer to an employee is less than the total amount of wages that is properly payable by him to the employee on that occasion (after making any deductions therefrom that fall to be made and are in accordance with this Act), or (b) none of the wages that are properly payable to an employee by an employer on any occasion (after making any such deductions as aforesaid) are paid to the employee, then, except in so far as the deficiency or non-payment is attributable to an error of computation, the amount of the deficiency or non-payment shall be treated as a deduction made by the employer from the wages of the employee on the occasion. Findings Based on the uncontradicted evidence of the Complainant, I find that there was a shortfall in the wages that were due to be paid to him on Friday 1 April 2022 in the amount of €1,095 and that this shortfall should be treated as a deduction in line with section 6 of the Act above. |
Decision:
Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under Schedule 6 of that Act.
I find that the complaint is well founded for the reasons set out above and direct that the Respondent make a payment of €1,095 to the Complainant. |
Dated: 15-05-2023
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Breiffni O'Neill
Key Words:
|