FULL RECOMMENDATION
CD/23/138 CC No. CAM-100217-22 | RECOMMENDATION NO. LCR22835 |
SECTION 26(1), INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS ACT, 1990
PARTIES:GARRETT ADVANCING MOTION (REPRESENTED BY IRISH BUSINESS AND EMPLOYERS' CONFEDERATION)
- AND -
10 WORKERS (REPRESENTED BY CONNECT)
DIVISION:
Chairman: | Ms Connolly | Employer Member: | Mr Marie | Worker Member: | Ms Tanham |
SUBJECT:
1.Pay Claim
BACKGROUND:
2.This matter could not be resolved at local level and was the subject of Conciliation Conferences under the auspices of the Workplace Relations Commission. As agreement was not reached, the matter was referred to the Labour Court on 9 May 2023 in accordance with Section 26(1) of the Industrial Relations Act, 1990. A Labour Court hearing took place on 19 September 2023.
RECOMMENDATION:
The matter before the Court is a pay claim by Connect on behalf of ten maintenance craft workers.
The parties have failed to find agreement on a revised rate of pay for maintenance workers following the expiry of a previous pay agreement on21 March 2022. That agreementapplied toall Connect members on site, i.e. Branch No. 1 (maintenance workers) and Branch No. 2 (general operatives). A separate pay agreement has now concluded between the company and Branch No. 2 (general operatives).
Connect contends that the hourly rate of pay of its members has fallen below comparators in the area due to pay freezes over the years. Its pay claim is based on a “Recovery Rate of Pay” aimed at bringing pay rates in line with peers locally.
The Company’s position is that it is not in a position to enter talks on pay recovery. It contends that Branch No.1 and Branch No.2 workers have accepted the same increases in pay for over twenty years, and to offer pay increases that differ significantly would impact relations on site.
The parties have provided comprehensive written and oral submissions to the Court, which the Court has carefully considered. The Court notes that a final offer made by the company at conciliationon22 February 2023 included an additional 1% increase to apply from January 2025, which was over and above the increases agreed with Branch No. 2 (general operatives). That offer was rejected by the maintenance workers and so withdrawn by the company. Having regard to all of the circumstances,the Court recommends that therevised offer made by the company at conciliation, which includes an additional 1% to apply from 1 January 2025, should bereinstated by the company andaccepted by the union. That offer in full provides as follows: The Company also proposed a 10% increase in the tool allowance and a commitment to review apprenticeships at the site.The Court so recommends.
| Signed on behalf of the Labour Court | | | | Katie Connolly | GOG | ______________________ | 10 October 2023 | Deputy Chairman |
NOTE
Enquiries concerning this Recommendation should be addressed to Garrett O'Grady, Court Secretary. |