ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION

Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00045349

Parties:

	Complainant	Respondent
Parties	James Butterly	Parkview Hotel (Chris Kelly Group) Gemstoke Ltd

Representatives

Complaint(s):

Act	Complaint/Dispute Reference No.	Date of Receipt
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 7 of the Terms of Employment (Information) Act, 1994	CA-00056091-001	16/04/2023
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 27 of the Organisation of Working Time Act, 1997	CA-00056091-003	16/04/2023
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 27 of the Organisation of Working Time Act, 1997	CA-00056091-004	16/04/2023
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 27 of the Organisation of Working Time Act, 1997	CA-00056091-005	16/04/2023
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 7 of the Terms of Employment (Information) Act, 1994	CA-00056091-006	16/04/2023

Date of Adjudication Hearing: 31/08/2023

Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Conor Stokes

Procedure:

In accordance with Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act, 2015 following the referral of the complaints to me by the Director General, I inquired into the complaints and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the complaints.

Background:

The hearing took place in Lansdowne House. The complainant did not attend the hearing while the respondent and witnesses for the respondent were in attendance.

Summary of Complainant’s Case:

The complainant did not attend the hearing of these matters.

Summary of Respondent’s Case:

The respondent and witnesses for the respondent were in attendance for the hearing of these matters.

Findings and Conclusions:

As the complainant did not attend the hearing of these matters, no evidence was presented to me in support of this claim. A hearing notification letter issued to the complainant, consequently I am satisfied that the complainant is on notice. He has offered no explanation for his absence.

As no evidence was presented in support of these complaints, I find that these complaints are not well founded.

Decision:

Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaints in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under Schedule 6 of that Act.

CA-00056091-001