ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION
Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00039275
Parties:
| Complainant | Respondent |
Parties | Yasmin Thornton | Panda Asian Fusion Carmen Ling Ltd |
Representatives | No appearance | Carmen Ling |
Complaint(s):
Act | Complaint/Dispute Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under Section 12 of the Minimum Notice & Terms of Employment Act, 1973 | CA-00050841-001 | 24/05/2022 |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 6 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1991 | CA-00050841-003 | 24/05/2022 |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 27 of the Organisation of Working Time Act, 1997 | CA-00050841-004 | 24/05/2022 |
Date of Adjudication Hearing: 02/12/2022
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Michael MacNamee
Procedure:
In accordance with Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act, 2015following the referral of the complaints to me by the Director General, I inquired into the complaints and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the complaint(s)/dispute(s).
Background:
There was no appearance by or on behalf of the Complainant. Ms. Carmen Ling appeared on behalf of Respondent. |
Summary of Complainant’s Case:
There was no appearance by the Complainant. After reviewing the file, I am satisfied that she was on full notice of the hearing. I waited a reasonable time but there was no appearance by the Complainant at the hearing. |
Summary of Respondent’s Case:
Ms. Carmen Ling appeared on behalf of Respondent. |
Findings and Conclusions:
On the basis that there was no appearance on behalf of the Complainant, the Respondent had no case to answer. Therefore, the complaints are not well founded. |
Decision:
Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint(s)/dispute(s) in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under Schedule 6 of that Act.
CA-00050841-001 - Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under Section 12 of the Minimum Notice & Terms of Employment Act, 1973- Decision: The Act was not contravened CA-00050841-003 - Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 6 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1991- Decision: The Claim is not well-founded CA-00050841-004 - Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 27 of the Organisation of Working Time Act, 1997 – Decision: The Claim is not well-founded |
Dated: 2nd of August 2024
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Michael MacNamee
Key Words:
Minimum Notice – Payment of Wages – Organisation of Working Time – No appearance |